Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    13136
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by BurntEyes

  1. All following Data is per CFBStats Texas National Offensive Rankings: Total offense: #80 Scoring offense: #64 Rusing Offense: #103 Passing Offense #50 Sacks Allowed: #86 Tackles for Loss Allowed: #106 First Downs: #108 Time of Possesion: #97 Red Zone Conversions: #85 Third Down Conversions: #82 Of note: Arch Manning's #40 ranking in Passing All Games is the highest single stat of the entire Texas offense kept by CFBStats that I found. Penalties: #119 (both O and D)
  2. You answered your own question in your post.
  3. I've got to find a way to make roster tampering part of my regular Surly lexicon.
  4. I don't hate your posts at all. They amuse me, like a clown. All fan bases and boards need juvenile shit talkers that learned their trade on social media. If this place didn't have regards to entertain us with pointless things that make no sense it would just be people preaching to we enlightened as to why we're horrible fans. No sir, I love your posts. Now you're not in the rarified air of @David Dennison as his contrary opinion hate baiting is next level fun but dont let that get you down. Keep it up, and maybe someday you too can figure out the algorithm to make us ALL smile on the reg. Good bye and good luck!
  5. Players get all the women. Damn...
  6. Oh man totally got me. I'm crushed by your top tier smack. So witty and brilliant. So you have provide exactly jack shit to support any of your points. I'm impressed.
  7. Pete too. But in Sark's defense Pete and Nick both paid close attention to the OL and RB room so, that's not really fair as the talent was likely substantially better. Plus neither Pete not Nick used NFL style practices. That's dinosaurs for you.
  8. I find myself pretty hawt! That's solid self confidence.
  9. Well I mean if a player knows with certainty that he won't get hit by the D, the rb won't be hit and the QB won't be hit, it decreases anxiety and probability of jumping off sides. Aside from that, they also face no ramifications if they do. All Gas - no accountability so... why would they care? (Outside being shit on by their HC in press conferences)
  10. I really don't even know what point you're trying to make in all of this drivel, but maybe the poster you responded to can figure it out.
  11. Ah... the way the aggie fans responded was similar to Sarks. That's what you're landing on as its the only example, for which you provided no backing, of your entire point. Let's just go ahead and pretend you provided evidence. You've aligned Sark's comments to that of aggie fans. Solid counter point to him not being a petulant child.
  12. I see. You have nothing to support your position and are talking in circles. It's a bold strategy.
  13. Have you seen a single thing that he's said that indicated any willingness to change. Setting aside the fact that the only issues have been players according to him, have you seen him acknowledged any coaching issues? If not, what evidence leads you to believe he will course correct?
  14. I've never claimed the thrown if shit poster. I would never try and take that crown for Rimbo or the other amazing candidates in this thread. So.. you don't have any examples other than what aggie fans would say.
  15. *Are And there is no fuck arrow line between me and Nicole. I think it should be a dotted one because I don't THINK she is trying to fuck herself, unless I am her while being me and she is me. Wait...
  16. So you're saying there's a chance?
  17. For the record, nobody ever sent me any dingsong porn. I haz a sad.
  18. God damn genius! *Are
  19. Crying about being poached, bitching at people saying he's leaving. Pick one.
  20. You forgot I am either her sock or trying to fuck her. Gonna need you to update your drawing.
  21. I mean... it is the Texas campus. This is a pretty fucking solid argument.
  22. Is it the new team that Sark is going to be coaching next year? Cause if so, I think that should be a one way arrow too.
  23. Have you heard Lane or any other coaches that might be in demand make similar statements? Please, I haven't heard of any like Sark's but I'm good with being educated if they have occured.
  24. But this model has failed in college before specifically because it doesn't allow for clear view of issues in practice. It works for the NFL because you don't have the volume of turnover of players in an off season like say, QB, OL, WR and TE. It doesn't allow for actual evaluation in a playing situation because there is very limited contact. Think flag football. It's critical in the NFL because you can't have your stars or even OL getting hurt. It's a required risk in college. Beyond all that, how the hell did Sark think it was well oiled and finely tuned with all those new pieces? That might even be worse of an indictment than the error of having that type of practice.
×
×
  • Create New...