Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    10132
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by BurntEyes

  1. Our record this year would beg to differ with you, Skattebo.
  2. Both fan bases are insufferable. I hate ND. I think Texas matches up better against ND. I think Kirby has Sark's number. Hence, yay domers.. said with tons of enthusiasm.
  3. So you're just fucking dismissing Georgia should we face them and think it's a given Texas will win Georgia3? That's a pretty bold call based based on some earlier games this year.
  4. Part. Stockton is also just good.
  5. Wtf are you on about??? Dude, take a fucking breath. Our kicking was shitty yesterday. It's okay to admit that reality.
  6. Yeah they've been shit all year like asu... and both are out performing(ed) Texas in the CFP... sigh
  7. Hitting WRs in stride, kicking FGs... what is all this madness!!!
  8. You're not wrong. Sadly. I've said it a few times and actually said it while AT the SEC championship.. addition by subtraction. Sigh... I didn't want to be right.
  9. And Kirby has know him since he was a child. Yeah..
  10. Fixed. He ain't new to the program.
  11. Stockton may well be better than Beck. 🥺
  12. Pretty much but not really, only sort of...
  13. I hate you for being accurate on this one.
  14. Just fucking wait. In a very different way.. yes. Think aggie arrogance and myopic world view with a much better success history, better record against Texas with lack of a sheep humping, cult cheer squad and fake army.
  15. I've been telling people they're the worst in the SEC for over a year. Folks will learn.
  16. Keep watching.
  17. He'd legit. People don't know his history and have under estimated him. I actually think it's an upgrade for Georgia, sadly.
  18. Stockton is legit and I think that he's going to be the difference in this game.
  19. Nobody that I have seen is asking that Sark gives up control off his offense. Zero. NONE. NOBODY. Also, when he was play calling for Saban and others he wasn't a fucking head coach. What is clear, if you actually look objectively is that he is NOT adjusting in game well. 3rd quarter out front should have told you. Asking Sark to replicate what Saban, Reid and others HAVE done in altering strategies and adapting is what's going on. Reducing what he does have to manage and giving up a modicum on responsibilities and allowing a knowledgeable person to call games and make in game offensive adjustments is a reasonable ask. We aren't advocating that Sark doesnt come up with the plan or offense, at all. We are hoping for adaptation and growth through delegation of very specific responsibilities. Its what every great head coach, CEO or hell leader does. Claiming that any criticism of Sark is ignorant would indicate Sarks been dead solid perfect at Texas offensively. If you believe that to be the case, we've nothing to discuss at all because Steve himself would say you were wrong.
  20. Yeah, I think that's the nature of the world today and it's evident in several threads. Lots of reasons for it but I think it stems from social media at the core. You're with "us" or against "us" and the political landscape sure has shit has negatively impacted that reality. It's possible that I support and I'm grateful for Sark while at the same time see issues. Just like I can support and like Ewers as a player and see issues. It's not all binary. It isn't team Love Sark and team Fire Sark. Sark has greatly outperformed all my expectations, EXCEPT, his game day execution. Even there I'm not saying it is ALL shit, we would not have won as many game as we have the past 2 years if it were. Rather, I'm calling out specific issues with his game day execution and the data supports my positions. Doesn't mean I want Sark fired or hate Sark, at all. It means I want Sark to adapt aspects of his coaching, like the best college football coaches in history have, so he becomes one of them. That ultimately results in Texas AND Sark being more successful. That's not anti Sark at all. The day this board becomes "Never question players or coaches and don't post any negative things or you're anti-Texas" is the day it becomes aggie and I'm fucking out.
  21. This is a much better said version of my post just above. I've zero issues with Sarks offensive game plan in broad strokes. He is just really shitty at play calling and adjustments in game. I'm also of the opinion that he's "protecting" himself and Quinn with his game plan too much. I think it limits Quinn which is part of the mental issues Quinn has in games. When Quinn is cut loose and allowed to "play the game", he shines and last night was the perfect example of that reality.
  22. This! Down blocking run some I and punch those tiny, but extremely athletic ASU pussies in their fucking nose.
  23. If by adjusting forever in your adjustments in game you mean forever as in, hasn't happened yet this season I agree. If he can't make them over half time he sure as fuck can't make them in game time. Hence, my reason for a game day offense consultant. Sark dreams the schemes and makes the plans. Someone else runs it during actual games. Has to be someone he doesn't think he's smarter than and respects. Hence my vote for Saban or Carol. They get back into the fun of coaching and flexing their smarts/feeding their egos without all the NIL, media, alumni, sponsorship and other bullshit a head coach deals with daily (along with the AD)
  24. I think you meant vials for collection. Kinda difficult to squeeze those delicious tears outta Kleenex and I'm always thirst for them.
×
×
  • Create New...