Jump to content

BurntEyes

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    10136
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by BurntEyes

  1. Not putting some responsibility for the loss in a championship game on the QB where a team scored 1 TD in 7 trips is just insane. It's fucking crazy talk. Saying it was everyone BUT the QBs fault goes beyond fanboi crazy. It's just fucking regarded, and you know it.
  2. I stand corrected.. my apologies good sir.
  3. Just because you don't remember doesn't mean it didn't happen. Edit - but you do bring up a good point. Sark 0 - Deboer 2 Sark 0 - Smart 2
  4. Georgia prevented us from getting in the end zone 7 out of 8 times in the redzone. I would say they had something to do with it. Bert and 10 other guys - 5 out of 7 Quinn and 10 other guys- 0 out of 7 Who performed better?
  5. And if we want to do redzone performance blame game... Bert- 5 out of 7 Quinn- 0 out of 7 Who performed better?
  6. Pulling the aggie luck card??? You're better than that dude.
  7. Nobody is asking him to be perfect, but when the entire fucking world sees his issues, maybe it's actually a problem. Yes, field goals are acceptable, but kicking field goals on 7 trips to the red zone sure as fuck isn't for a team that wants to win a championship, or for any team that wants to win a game. And we fucking didn’t.
  8. How many field goals tries were there in total? 7. Were we in the redzone all 7 times? Yes. Are field goals the preferred outcome in the redzone? No. Did we try and use our mobile QB in the redzone? No. Did one of them get longer due to QB performance? Yes. So, either you'd rather trust the outcome of a conference championship game to a kicker, or you can acknowledge that our QB didn't perform great in the redzone and neither did our HC. Are there others to blame, sure. But riddle me this, who, on any football team are the 2 most important people?
  9. Heheh... Michigan fans are the closest facsimile of Texas fans I've ever met. Does beating OSU help, absolutely. Does getting beat by Bama enrage the Michigan fans.. would it enrage Texas fans. Does Moore have a wiggle room, yes. Would getting beat, or worse beat badly by Bama decrease the good will.. Yes. Yes it fucking would. As a tshirt Michigan fan and a Longhorn.. Well... that's my take.
  10. I don't know how many times it's be rewashed, but have a non-mobile QB causes substantial issues in the running game with good defensive teams. Georgia1 and Georgia2 out front should have told you. Now to your videos, how many were in the redzone? What area have I and others been specifically pointing out as the problem area. How many TDs did we score in the redzone vs Georgia2? Are there other areas that need work, yes. Have I denied that at any point, no. Have I also pointed it out multiple times on this very page, yes. Have you, at any point, acknowledged that Quinn has some issue? Not in this post. Are you willing to acknowledge Quinn had some major issues in the redzone? I'm doubtful. Are you willing to admit using Arch much more frequently in the redzone against Georgia could have potentially increased our odds of scoring? I'm doubtful. Is this a binary Quinn only issue? No. Is our lack of success in redzone against Georgia and other teams during the season something that should be addressed by our HC? Absolutely. Is Arch the answer? Sadly, we don't know but MAYBE. Should we know the answer? Absolutely! Is Quinn the answer? No is the clear correct response.
  11. And Arch could have a lot more too, but that time passed. Arch could STILL have playoff snap experience. You know... for next year.
  12. Life isn't fair and we aren't asking Arch to carry the team. We're asking for our dumb ass head coach to USE him as a part of the offensive scheme. Not A (one single) play, but in the red zone USE the tools you have. Or don't and suffer the consequences.
  13. Dude, my post about opposing fans recognizing Arch is better was real. Let that sink in, Georgia fans, asking ME, post the SEC championship when we were going to start Arch. Some of us don't need a year to recognize who the better player is and some of us aren't asking Arch to start. What we are asking for is that our head coach pull his head out of is asshole and use Arch more frequently in the redzone. Use the tools available, and stop being so god damn cute/smart.
  14. But if we're running Arch in the redzone frequently there is a real possibility that we don't need the field goals and don't got to OT. Sure, there is blame that can go elsewhere, in the end not using a great tool at QB more frequently, is one failure by Sark. Are there other areas that need improvement, absolutely. There was a great post (maybe by you) about this teams lack of attention to detail. That's also an HC issue. So is our shittastic ST play. While there are other aspects beyond JUST the shit performance of Quinn in the redzone in this game (and others) and the lack of using Arch where Sark failed, this is the Ewers thread so I'm focused on that aspect here.
  15. But he didn't, and we didn't. In this game, Georgia1 nor the Sugar Bowl. We don't need "hero ball" from a QB, we need one who can execute in the red zone against good defensive teams. Putting in a mobile QB to offset the Georgia advantages on D, in the redzone, where Quinn was struggling greatly, perhaps does. We have evidence supporting, a lot of it, that leaving him in, hasn't and won't. Sark has to pull his head out of his ass, stop being cute and smart and use the tools at his disposal.
  16. This is a great post and highlights something that seems to be missed by a lot of folks in this thread (on both sides). Football is a game of match ups. A great HC should be aware of this reality and so should informed fans. Suggestions that a particular player at QB has issues and that the HC should recognize that reality isn't binary. I said months ago that Sark made the Ewers bed post Georgia1. That not switching to Arch then was a season long commitment by the HC, whether I agreed with it or not. I also clarified WHY I thought Sark made that choice, whether or not I agreed with it, I did understand. So, I acknowledged then and do now that Ewers is going to remain the starter. However, I do question why our HC would NOT use an amazing tool in his war chest for the SEC Title game. Particularly, when it was clear that the starting QB was struggling in the red zone. A great HC makes the call, other factors be dammed, to win the game in front of them. The game you're playing and victory therein is the most important factor. Not draft status, not NIL, not pressure from outside sources, not concern about players feelings, but winning the game. I also recognize that in today's portal world and NIL the Saban type choices are becoming a bit antiquated. However, had Sark made a choice to play Arch more, particularly in the redzone where Quinn and the offense was struggling badly, and we win, the players aren't crying in the locker room. Even better, every team we face now has a bigger scheming issue in the playoffs. It's not binary. Too many here see it as such. Use the tools at hand, when needed, to win the game at hand, as needed. That's what a championship caliber HC does, and Sark didn’t this weekend nor in Georgia1. Yes, it's a Quinn and Sark issue.
  17. I don't think you or @Rockethorn1978 are incorrect in your predictions. However, as both these coaches are in their 1st year and have vastly underperformed relative to their predecessors I think this game is different. These are two helmet schools of the highest level. The pressure on these HCs after this year's performance doesn't get any higher. I'm not saying there won't be players that opt out. However, were I the HC I'd let it be known they are welcome to opt out and enter the draft or portal, no harm no hate. However, they better do 1 of the 2 as they won't be playing "here" next year. Just my thought and I firmly believe that the fans bases of both would back the coach. But wtf do I know.
  18. How did Ewers perform in the redzone against Georgia1 and Georgia2? Could it possibly be that it's a reflection on the HC for chosing to start and continued use of a player that has performed poorly and for the execution by said player? Are both being a factor impossible?
  19. And one of the two was actually denied another by... in one of the best college football games of all time.
  20. Dude... fucking spoiler that shit next time or choose different words. It's triggering to think of someone sneezing when a bunch of tasty lines have been laid out. Asshole!
  21. Ftfy Turdition is turdition. Aggies love their turditions.
  22. Lulz, how many TDs did we score in the red zone yesterday? What was out success rate in the red zone yesterday? You refuse to put any responsibility on the loss on our QB. You never will despite whatever evidence is presented. You write shit that's just not true. Fabrication is the word. That's not changing and neither is Quinn's ability. So.. I've come to an end of this round and round with you, but I'm sure you'll need, very badly need the last word. So... you can have it.
  23. Shadeur as the starter, Beck for backup as second pic, Deion as Head and QB coach. It will work out fantastic.
  24. Jerry is gonna take the INT monkey Beck mostly because he's a die hard Pig deep at heart.
  25. His technique and throwing motion, lack of mobility, lack of speed, lack of evasiveness, and fragile nature is all physical. (Well the fragile nature is both)
×
×
  • Create New...