Football ...
Basketball ...
Baseball ...
Other Sports ...
Futbol ...
🤫995🤫 ...
Gambling ...
Movies & TV ...
Music ...
Hobbies ...
Lulz ...
Food & Travel
...
Daily Texan ...
Business & Markets ...
Cloak Room ...
Help ...
For Sale ...
Board Discussion ...
Advertise...
Tailgate Donations
JFKFC
-
Posts
2793 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by JFKFC
-
Would it be too much of an inconvenience to have this event moved to Biloxi? -
-
-
-
-
I can name at least 35 Big 12 teams that can beat them.
-
-
-
This chick was stalking me before the Bama game. She followed me into the men's room so I took this pic:
-
I think we will be up 100-forfeit at halftime, but then....?
-
I was talking about Hall getting suspended. Bless your heart, you are doing the best you can to keep up. I'm proud of you!
-
Of course not. No one should ever take an o-lineman or quality edge rusher from the portal. We need to focus on taking WRs & pass-catching TEs who get suspended and don't produce for the team. Sark has the formula.
-
No sane person is 100% convinced we will lose tomorrow. Tomorrow is a coin flip. It could go either way...and that is the problem. We should all be 100% convinced that we will beat this joke of a hillbilly football team, but we aren't, because of Sark.
-
This is a brand new experience for us. We've never had enemies before. Never even dreamed of it. You, sir, are a ray of enlightenment, bring the college football world out of the dark ages. Maybe next week you will discover that Texas A&M is strange.
-
It is exactly the same. Too conservative. Too many key 3rd and 4th downs without additional pressure via blitz. Just like last season. I'm not sure what games you are watching.
-
We sucked at sacking the QB last year and this year. PK is consistent in his scheme.
-
You are jumping in at the tail end of a long conversation. This all goes back to something that was told to me by USC grad, not something I said. It was radically misinterpreted by another poster.
-
You have created a bizarre narrative in your own brain that had nothing to do with what was written. He wasn't a bad coach because he drank, he drank because he was a bad coach. He doesn't have the capacity to be a successful head coach in big time college football. This depressed him and caused him anxiety, so he drank. Then, you responded, "No one is better at anything because they drink" as if the posted statement implied he drank to be a better coach. No, he drank in the past because he sucks at being a head coach and knows he will never succeed at being a head coach.
-
No one said anyone is better at anything because they drink. I can't even begin to fathom how you think that was stated in any way. Did you go to Texas Tech?
-
After the West Virginia game, I think you will be able to talk more 4* and 5* recruits into fighting for Russia in Ukraine than playing ball for Sark in Austin.
-
Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ, we've played 2 non-power 5 teams & Texas Tech and we're 72 in total offense and 75 in total defense. I think I'm going to drive down to Sark's office and take a dump on his desk.
-
This is a chance to carry my legacy forward in to 2023 after I murder myself after our 2nd consecutive loss to Kansas this November.
-
I had a business conversation last evening with a USC grad (he has a Masters from USC). He is a big football fan and we discussed Sark. He has been following Sark's career for a longer time than any of us. He feels a lot of people give Sark a pass on his poor performance as a head coach pre-Texas because of his alcoholism. He insists Sark wasn't a bad head coach because he drank. He drank because he is a bad head coach. I think he is likely correct.
