im on ep 6 now. I am absolutely fascinated by this whole thing. As someone who once was the jury foreman on an armed robbery case, and saw a few people (I believe may have used race as a factor rather than facts) try and railroad a young black girl into 2-25 on an armed robbery charge I am really really really sensitive to people operating under the presumption of innocence, and making sure the prosecution absolutely proves beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of the defendant. So many things about this bug me to no end. Dassey and Avery are both convicted using two very different accounts of what happened. interesting. The case the prosecution put on against Avery is proven untrue. Shady evidence with zero logical explanation. THe key found on the 6th search, in plain site, and contains only Avery's DNA. the dna on the hood latch that seemingly has no real source, and concentration levels not feasible, and is not blood nor saliva is interesting. two burn sites, the license plate issue is well documented. That said, the hypothesis that the cops, or someone happened to break into his trailer at the moment he happened to be bleeding and they happened to get really lucky that he had left a pool of blood on his sink is also not really believable to me. The framers just happened to get that lucky and have collection kits on them, get an amount of blood to spread around the car? Maybe, but what luck and coincidence. That said, the blood smear on the dash doesn't appear to have gotten there through normal methods of turning the key in the ignition. Zero shot that key wouldn't have had some blood on it too. THe boyfriend explanation of the broken light is interesting.
I will say the Avery's are clearly PWT, and the guy absolutely appears to be a guy capable of who knows what. If he killed her it absolutely would not shock me. That said, I cannot at this point think this has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. No way the guy was smart enough to shackle this girl, stab her in the stomach, cut her throat in the house, then load her into her car, drive her around all over, burn her in barrel, spread the bones around in his property in a bon fire, and somehow leave no blood DNA in the bedroom where all this happened. No way if he hand was bleeding enough to leave in smeared in the car there isn't his blood mixed in the back with her dead body and blood. yet, it isn't anywhere in the back of the car. None of that is logical, nor really possible. The evidence simply does not support the murder in the way the prosecution sold it, and the way dassey stated. I am the type who believes if he is guilty of this he should receive the death penalty asap. I also believe if he has been locked up all these years as an innocent man framed by some cops pissed off they wrongly imprisoned him, and are getting sued by him, they need to be locked up the same sentence he has been given (life without parole). Taking a persons freedom is a very serious thing. we have to be extremely certain guilt is proven.
I could watch Zellner analyze and do her thing 24/7. That lady is committed to her craft, and I love that she seems to have an absolute no bullshit, DGAF where the evidence leads, she simply wants the truth even if it might proven her client guilty.