Sorry everybody, but I guess I'll try one more time.
The simplest difference between UTs legal NIL efforts through Texas One Fund and aggy's non NIL pay for play is contracts.
The reason why it took until November for Texas One Fund to get released is that it takes a long time for something that massive to get pitched, organized, funded, vetted through lawyers to ensure it met State law, vetted through compliance to ensure it met NCAA rules, get launched, get basic contracts written up, get those vetted, and then get them signed. A&M said, "Nah, fuck all that". UTs Texas One Fund was not "months late". It was actually what you are trying to argue about A&M.... Texas One Fund was the earliest and first of it's kind. It was not "months late" compared to anyone or any other NIL initiative, certainly not A&M.
So yes, I will argue the notion that "A&M's disorganized booster led NIL was not really NIL". Because unless they started organizing a year before NIL was announced, there is no way they went through the proper steps in time to ensure it was legal.
Texas athletes signed legal contracts in relation to their NIL, reported that income, paid taxes on that income, etc.
I would be confident in stating that A&M athletes in the 2022 class did not sign contracts for those payments, did not report it, did not pay taxes on it, etc. As mentioned above, if everything was on the up and up and it was legal because "that's what the Texas lege lazyly allowed", then why would Jimbo publicly and vehemently deny that it was NIL? If it was legal, it would've been in his best interest to say "Yup! We have the best and earliest NIL and it's all vetted and legal! Come get paid at A&M!" But he had to lie about it because it was not vetted and legal. And therefore it was not legal NIL. And A&M was certainly not first in the NIL race.