Well now you're just being argumentative. Baseball has always been changing? Jesus Christ. It's barely changed at all since the 1920s. Better equipment, nutrition, training, and all that changed. What went on between the lines barely budged and what movement there was wasn't very hard to keep up with. The introduction of analytics to baseball was the most earth shaking change to how the game is played that's ever happened to baseball. If you're going to try to tell me Ricky & Weaver's dedication to analytics was even a fraction of what we are seeing now, you're just being a contrarian for the sake of fun. At best, they dipped their toes in it. Hell, the didn't have access to computers in those days, so I don't even know how that would work. Lots of nights bent over a poorly lit desk with scorecards and a handful of #2 pencils is the best I could imagine.
Earl liked to play small ball, but it helped to have a pitching staff of Palmer, Cueller, McNally, and one other guy I can't recall (Dobson maybe?). Just like the A's of Hudson, Zito, and one other guy I can't recall right now (Mulder maybe?) was why money ball was successful. By the way, I guarantee Joe respected Earl and Ricky's baseball knowledge. They're baseball men and not "computer nerds" who never played the game. In other words, your entire post was full of bullshit and cheap unfounded shots. Be fair at least and don't stretch the truth.