Of course. But you told me that I have "no fucking clue" what I am talking about.
I don't really care what sort of academic dick measuring contests take place in your industry.
People with PhDs that roll around introducing themselves as Dr so and so outside of academic settings are generally pretentious little twats. And that extends to physicians to a certain extent as well, outside of clinical or academic settings.
Literally everyone I work with, with rare exception, has at least one doctorate. Some clinical doctorates as well, MD, etc. And double dipping. Rare for any of them to introduce themselves as Dr. so and so or use their academic titles in normal professional exchanges. To the extent that they do, more typical for the physicians. Academic settings are of course different. And certainly clinical situations.
What about Trump??!!?
Trump has NPD. Everyone with two eyes, no pdh or md required, knows that. Everyone in his inner circle knows that. Sorry you have to hear this from me.
The DNC and the media shit the bed with Biden 2024 guys. It will be ok. A little self reflection might be in order, but you aren't gonna want to hear that from me. I get it.
Every one with two eyes, no phd or md required, knew that biden was mentally declined for a long time. Everyone in the inner circle certainly knew it. Everyone that has dealt with dementia and the aging process with family personally knows this. Again, no phd in ed psych or whatever required. They covered it up. It's pretty obvious. I would wager a large amount that they had indications of the prostate cancer over a year ago as well. No reason to believe that they did not cover that up as well.
Sorry that you guys have to hear this shit from me.
I can't even believe that I am entertaining the notion of getting involved in a conversation with an aggie of how people with academic doctorates refer to themselves in real life situations compared to physician's use of the term doctor.
Not really, outside academic settings.
The best clowns are the ones that have them in their social media handles though. Surly weather man not included of course.
We should have totally different set of physical and mental health screening guidance for potus compared to my elderly uncle. The risk dynamic around false positives is totally different. It’s not a population health equation at that level. Well it is. But a very different one.
I all seriousness, I think their drug has big potential upside. The fda really fucked them full fist. Not sure the regulatory environment esp wrt oncology is going to be rosy in the near term future. Price target $25.
It's almost like any other psychiatric condition should be handled, informed by the principles of evidence based medicine.
It's wilding that this is not obvious.