Jump to content

achooloco

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    2406
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by achooloco

  1. There is definitely some confusion. I’m not in the field but close enough to know that Pro bono immigration attorneys across nyc are taught ice admin warrants are full of shit and never let them in. now sure, the nuance is there so both viewpoints can be right and thus the confusion exists. But god, the constitution, and ethics should dictate anything magat advocated is wrong. They are the empire. They are wrong. They are wrong here. It isn’t a debate
  2. It’s not effective. Ice admin warrants don’t allow you access to homes or property.
  3. Are you being facetious?
  4. Nope. She correctly called out a bullshit ice admin warrant that has no legal binding effect. The dotard anti constitution pieces of shit are 100% wrong on this. They can bitch but No fed judge warrant, no legal warrant. This makes sense since today those fucking traitors published the Doj paper saying ice admin warrants curtailed the 4th amendment. they’re wrong. Fuck them. Exercise you’re second amendment
  5. They are literally locking up judges for following the law. Citizens for literally being brown. Get fucked dumtard.
  6. If you’re too stupid too understand the law then shut the fuck up
  7. Gravy Gestapo. Doxx them. even if that should never ever happen cause hey I get it is problematic (not as much as having a fucking felon as president), all ICE folk are pieces of shit. An ice warrant is not good enough. You need a warrant signed by a fed judge. That’s the law. Everyone else can get fucked cause they’re wrong. Obey the 4th or kneel before the 2nd.
  8. Like I said, hope all these pieces of shit just following orders never have a good nights sleep and burn In hell sooner rather than later.
  9. Goddamn! I expected anger if it was the fakeout but that’s pretty dark.
  10. Kind of curious what the call outs were. Like were people mad they thought maga before reading it or they read it and appreciated the fake out?
  11. Talking shit to dumb dumb bigots is always a good idea
  12. That I actually agree with. S.ct fucked this up being pussy cowards avoiding the fight instead of fighting the fight that was coming for their branch and our country. +pos rep This I don’t agree with. If the executive commits an error, is told it is illegal, and refuses to correct it post haste, it DOESN’T FUCKING MATTER what the error is, it’s a de facto constitutional crisis. Anything less than acknowledging this, is a fault on the person trying to justify it. And considering it is a violation of a court removal order, then yeah it’s a huge fucking deal. so fuggle or any actual immigration lawyers feel free to chime in (I am by no means claiming to be an expert) but I got this info from my gf who has been a pro bono immigration lawyer/department boss for over a decade. Garcia got a withhold order of removal under CAT (convention against torture). That means he was found to more likely than not (>50%) be persecuted/tortured in the country to which he is to be removed to (more often than not his home country). As opposed to asylum where they only need to prove there is a >10% chance that there is a nexus for his prosecution (race, religion, nationality. Social group membership, or political opinion). So you’re definitely partially correct, there are more restrictions for removal withholds despite having a higher bar: before he was disappeared he couldn’t leave the country, had to regularly check in, didn’t have a green card, but he did have access to a work permit. So that CAT withhold order of removal means he can be sent to another country but he CANNOT be sent to El Salvador. Simple as fuck even magats should be able to understand but Fox News is the bane of this country’s existence. All in all that for me means dotard fucked up by removing him without due process, and especially for sending him to El Salvador since he is not only resisting a lawful court order but directly violating it by removing him to cecot. and if you say so what, he was removed, even if he comes back he’ll he denied access. Well you’d be fucking wrong. The proper channel to contest the withhold order of removal would be to appeal to the BIA, then the circuit court, etc. Essentially, don’t like it appeal to the judicial system and Rubio’s punk bitch ass and AG Nazi barbi bondi can get fucked. bring him back and give him due process but executive orders mean fuck all here and especially no sabo coconut Rubio.
  13. If he wasn’t Brown this wouldn’t be an allegation considering his occupation. And If your bullshit meter isn’t sounding off on driving while brown in the south, fuck you
  14. Well, fuck me, you’re right I was wrong. I will make a note of that when I’m explaining this to my trumpy cousin and my gf’s trumpy family in az (all Mexicans or Ecuadoreans with illegal immigrant family members currently in the USA… sigh, can’t fix stupid)
  15. You’re wrong about the fucking facts so educate yourself or stay out of the fucking conversation, you’re fucking wrong
  16. wrong. He was granted asylum, nothing questionable at all about it. He is a legal resident, full stop. If you don’t agree you’re wrong and you need to educate yourself
  17. For violating the constitution and holding any water for disappearing people into a prison hell hole, yeah, I’m good calling yall villains.
  18. Cause you’re wrong on the facts and wrong on the effect this has. And imma is wrong as well. So fuck off and stay wrong. Hobbes up there explained it out well and you had no reply.
  19. You sound fucking stupid mouth breather. Get fucked moron. But have a nice day!
  20. They have been but they didn’t at the time he was unlawfully picked up and deported.
  21. The judicial branch can declare acts done by the executive branch as illegal, so no we are not mistaken. And he was a legal resident when he was unlawfully abducted not an illegal. Jesus fucking Christ it’s like I’m playing cards with my brother’s kids
  22. s.ct. Just threw a pause on the above. But still they will give a more detailed decision In the next few days? Will we have a full blown constitutional crisis by the wknd? edit: Brisket beat me to it
  23. Was there for an hour. Honestly wasn't sure how many people it was but yeah, was very surprised by the lack of police presence.
  24. Pocahontas
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...