achooloco

Or just lie. Anyway to just put like 100 as baseline answer for every home? Everyday it gets worse. Trumpkins are scum of the earth. Quit fucking up our country assholes!

This might be funny if there were anyway possible you were joking.

Lulz, that sounds like a conservative not liberal, but what do I know? (No cr). I should join in queens, wonder what kind of bs is out here...

Fuck traitors who support the thin blue line. When cops cover up criminal acts in defiance of the law, they show their loyalty is to cops and not the law or the constitution. Fuck that and them.

That’s fair. So I guess the question is which is least harmful? Cause if I have to choose between corn crap and grain free... although if there were some cheap dog food that was not corn filled, I’m all ears.

That part To that part is the disconnect. Setting aside the fact that dogs would still inherently eat generally what their ancestors did (hello human paleo diet), just bc dogs ate scraps nothing in that would indicate they would be eating the “grains scraps” (whatever that hypothetical food may be) instead of leaving them aside. There is nothing “supposed to” about it, logically speaking. But ok, sure maybe they ate some, that is plausible. But the crap that purina, science diet, etc sell is almost all grains, and barely anything else. Even if SOME grains have been in their diets over thousands of years, the amount of grains being fed TODAY would not be equal to what they have evolved to eat along side humans. Edit: by grains I mean basically just corn. Not even fucking good grains, plain ass corn and corn filler

Fuck trump. Hope he has a painful end whenever it is.

God bless America and in that vein, while I know Its not Christian, i hope all trumpkins have miserable lives. And if karma exists, that they suffer before meeting their maker. On this day we celebrate freedom, it’s only right to chastise those that take us farther from that goal. Fuck trump and fuck you if you support him. Country is better without you, god bless America!

Agreed on the swing of worthless grains to extreme no grain. But Oof, there is a whole lot of wtf with that article. Makes me question the entire thing. But I’m not a vet. just logically thinking it through, I have some questions with the story (Sorry for the length of the post, have to work today so trying to be as unproductive as possible) But for the other link on TOTW, damn that sucks. Used to love that brand but not buying them again. Thanks for posting both. tl/dr: first article has glaring problems but do appreciate having more info, that never hurts. So the vet is quoted as advising a switch off of grain free bc wolves “May eat the contents” of herbivores in the wild? Strong use of logic for that assumption there doc. He’s a vet, shouldn’t he have that kind of knowledge, especially if giving his medical opinion based on that info? I’m sure there is some bird or fish out there that eats berries toxic to humans, but that doesn’t mean we can eat those same poisonous berries. Second, sure maybe some grain is fine (moderation and all that), but the proportion that wolves MAY ingest grain is WAY out of whack with what science diet/purina/etc put into their food. We’re talking Normal size girl to Vic chola special kind of ratio here. Article and the doc do a piss poor job of explaining any of that angle. Or how eating that much grain is not normal and can be bad for a dog. Third, the actual synopsis of the study (linked in the article) pretty much says they are going to study the dogs more for 6 months and that they have like 19 necropsies to perform but no real results yet. They did see a rise of heart disease in the dogs out of proportion to genetic propensity but outside of the breeds affected, there is not a single ounce of info on what kind of dogs exhibited the problems. By that I mean, where the dogs generally healthy? Were they chubbos? Did they have a lot of other problems? Were they within a normal weight and age range before they got heart disease? Considering most dogs get as much exercise as their owners and as a nation our obesity rates are going up, without more info, i’m going with fat people are giving their dogs heart disease. Or alternatively, people want to feed dogs what their ancestors ate but don’t give near the exercise needed to justify that kind of diet and bam, you get a sick dog. Sure, right now there seems to be a correlation to grain free but nothing close to causation. Plenty of other logical explanations for the rise in heart disease. fourth, lots of vets are shills for the big dog food corps. They get paid left and right to push shitty dog foods out there. And that’s fine, they gotta pay back school loans and put food on the table but let’s not act like it’s all purely science driven. So in this instance it Could just be lazy reporting, could just be a bad doc, but considering the lackluster reasons for advocating in support of grain, I’m leaning towards this is a hit piece being put out by the big competitors. More info is always good, let the consumer decide. So while there are for me lots of problems with the article, maybe peas, lentils, legumes, and potatoes do turn out to be bad for dogs? I’d definitely like to know that since my dog loves him some French fries and an occasional bean filled nacho that has missed my mouth and hit the floor instead. i feed him Stella and chewy raw blend, but would love to have the time to research and prepare straight raw. For me, I think it is logical to feed them as close to what they should be eating in the wild but I also try to walk him between 1-2 hours a day (can y’all guess I have no kids?). But that varies from dog to dog and owner to owner. If you eat like Phelps but have no daily physical regimen, your ass is gonna die unhealthy as fuck. But it isn’t the fault of the food. good luck finding one, I really like S&C but I’m sure there are other great brands out there.

Rooting for Sweden today, they were banging around with the Germans and just straight physically beat them down. Still great match though. Hopefully the USA wins Sunday but would love a tough hard fought exciting match. Either way, 11am bottomless brunch it is. Then games at 4 and 9. Can’t wait.

Oh I agree but they sure do seem to nitpick every little aoc, kamala, or Obama quote. I just want a record of their cowardice and hypocrisy. Hell, @slorch Still won’t answer why he is completely fine with trump breaking the law. I’d love to hear an honest answer.

@slorch @Onboard 2.0 @Johnny Sack @ChickenSandwich @Chrispy Or any other trump supporters, comments on forcing the military to work on a holiday? Especially when it is for no good reason and instead of honoring the country's Independence? Do y’all approve or disapprove of this action?

That shoulder check didn’t even get var! Whatevs, game was exciting, just feel bad for Messi. At least there are a couple more games of entertaining soccer before we are waiting around for fall camp to start.

Arg getting robbed. At least two blown penalty shots. Where the fuck is var?! Refs bought like hell

@slorch speaking about ignoring...

Apparently Derek is more disturbed by hashtags than dead brown children. Oh the horror of hashtags!

From your fingertips to god’s ears.

@slorch you still haven’t answered the questions I asked. And I negged the post that clearly states what the law is; regardless of merit, they can apply and are being illegally denied that application. You again counter with the equivalent of “I know their claims are bullshit” but THAT IS NOT THE POINT. Willful unrelated ignorance in the face of logic and reality is bitch made. It doesn’t matter if YOU believe in blaming rape victims and a beaten woman had it coming, the law says that the asylum seekers have a right to apply. I tried to only pos rep people’s posts that showed facts against your subjective opinions but when you disregard reality for your irrelevant speculations (based on literally no objective facts), you not only look like a dumb dumb (tech education holla!) but you’ll get negged each time. You won’t get negged to oblivion but crispy is getting there. Kind of funny that you disappear just as he shows up. Ultimately trump is breaking the law. you claim to want the law to be followed but It is pretty clear you don’t care about the law at all when it comes to trump. So does the law matter or not? The asylum seekers are trying to follow the law so why aren’t you triggered/outraged when trump breaks it?

You Look at those pictures and treatment, and your first thought is it’s their fault? Tbh That sounds rather rapey (“if women don’t want to get raped they shouldn’t wear attractive clothing” = “if you don’t want to be tortured, don’t come to this country seeking asylum”) and wife beater-esq. And your second thought is that NONE of them have asylum claims? And you base this second assertion on what now?

Good.

Ah. Just keeps saying “downloading content 0/2”, then the 2 became 40 and all it does is spin. Deleted app and reloaded but same thing. Then it’s stupid T-Mobile throttling my data. Oh well, I’ll log in from WiFi later. Thx

Anyone else having trouble logging in?

Fair retort but Ivanka didn’t even do that. Also I think it’s fair to point out that In general a pol runs and starts working which gives them experience. But with trump? He is the exception that proves the rule. Three years in and he doesn’t understand tariffs?! He is the most powerful person on earth but thinks sending an “invite” over twitter to a murderous despot is a sign of strength? Normal rules dont apply to anything trump. So with that in mind, crush him. Crush his stupid followers. Ridicule and berate their stupid feeble minds. Piss on their racist acquiescence. Fuck their complicit torture of children. A reckoning is coming. Hopefully it will be lawful and we become a stronger country for it but when one side tortures children as policy, demonizes truth, refuses to follow the constitution, chaos will ensue to reestablish order. God willing it will be short but expect the unexpected while trump is in charge and you won’t go broke.

Also, mind pointing to your posts calling out dotard for nepotism? For his understanding of tariffs? For his emoluments violations? For his lying about Korean War soldier’s remains? For his lies about his weight? For his childish daily behavior unbecoming of a president? I think that if you and other posters start being honest about dotards behavior and calling him out on it instead of turning a blind eye, then the name calling will decrease. Hell I’ll even make you a deal, I’ll stop calling him dotard if you can show me one of your posts calling him out on one of the first five questions? I don’t remember all your posts but this would be easy “money” if we were considering Johnny sacks, ewasome, Kyle, crispy, etc posts.