-
Posts
13694 -
Joined
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Huckleberry
-
-
Manchester City heading to Newport County on Saturday. I hate it when smaller clubs move the matches to the bigger club's location so this is fun. Their ground seats 7,850 I believe.
-
1
-
-
-
6 minutes ago, satyanash said:
Seems lazy of them though. If you're going to take info from other websites you should at least vet it first on your own terms, instead of relying on them to be 100% correct all the time.
Totally disagree. If all they were doing was essentially reporting the information that Rivals had, then what's the issue? If they had linked that profile with an original profile and rating of this kid on their own site then there's a problem.
-
Yeah, 247 seems like it auto-generated things based on scraping the Rivals site. This appears to be a 100% Rivals issue.
-
1
-
-
Does that post still exist? Would be awesome to review.My first impression of Daddy98 was him on Texags explaining how much better aggy’s 2002 class was than ours.
When we absolutely skull fucked them in recruiting. -
Open free agency would be fine. People underestimate the commitment that the vast majority of players have to their teammates and the simple inertia resisting most people making a change of that magnitude in their lives.
The only limitation that makes sense to me is what I posted previously. If a school has guaranteed a multiyear scholarship to a player and he has accepted then he should be limited. It's ridiculous that in the current system the school has no obligation to renew a scholarship for the next year but the player is obligated to stay at the school under penalty of sitting out a year, losing eligibility, or both (not to mention the current school being able to limit destinations).-
3
-
-
Yep, it's how you know he's not interested in a serious discussion from the start. In his initial response in this thread he declares that he's not interested in a "semantics" argument about how gender and sex aren't interchangeable terms. It's therefore impossible to engage in an actual discussion on the transgendered issue considering the entire concept of transgendered people is based on the fact that gender and sex aren't interchangeable.Here is an interesting read:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5824932/
But I'm not sure what evidence you want to discuss. Gender and sex are recognized as a distinct concepts for humans by pretty much anyone who studies either. You want to ignore that distinction because . . . I guess you find it inconvenient? I don't really understand your reasoning, but it makes discussion impossible.
But pointing that out just means you're not respecting his different viewpoint so you're the bigot and he's the victim. -
1 hour ago, Spankytoes said:
I assume this is aimed at me. My answer may be a letdown for you.
I don't have a problem with transgendered people as an idea. If you want to wear a dress and take hormones to grow tits, fine by me. I'll even call you a "she" if that's your preferred pronoun. It doesn't mean that I think, in any way, that you are actually a woman. I am doing it to be polite in the same manner that I don't point out that a girl is fat or how I bow my head when someone prays before a meal out of respect for their beliefs. You were born a man and still remain a biological man.
I'm not interested in the semantics of using "sex" and "gender" interchangeably to demonstrate whether or not they are social constructs. (We won't agree). Nor am I interested in discussing bigotry based on a more open and candid discussion I have on a message board that doesn't reflect my actual life. I am not actively making a trans person's life miserable. Frankly, it's not an issue I think or care about frequently.
So, there's really no problem other than your ability to accept that someone may have a different worldview than yourself.
lulz
Here comes spanky valiantly trying to turn himself into a victim again.
-
1 hour ago, Machinator said:
Seems like a completely reasonable starting spot.
-
Ha, yep. Here's the video of last year's girls 200 yard freestyle sprint relay final at the 6A state championship meet. Schools in the finals were a laundry list of inner city athlete hotbeds:
Austin Westlake
Round Rock
The Woodlands
Humble Kingwood
Houston Stratford
Cy-Fair
San Antonio Reagan
Katy TaylorThere's a noticeable lack of pigment occupying the 32 $300+ racing suits in that video.
-
Yeah, the two liveries I like best so far are Renault and Toro Rosso, which is weird because I don't like yellow generally speaking and red, white, and blue color schemes are a bit tiresome (or at least old hat) for obvious reasons.
Wait, forgot Haas. Didn't dislike it but wasn't in love with it when I saw it but it's growing on me as I see the alternatives. Ha.
-
Poor Vikings. Impressive in 6th place but the only one of the top 16, or top half of the league, without a Super Bowl title.
-
-
Hate the Red Bull, disagree with y'all on the Mercedes. Somehow manages to be boring and too busy at the same time. Downgrade from last year.
-
2
-
-
Different ways in different sets. The schedule rating on the regular ratings page (not linked in the menu right now) is just the average power rating of their opponents. The schedule rating on the EWP ratings page is the PWP rating the team would need to have in order to expect a .500 record against the schedule they faced.
-
2
-
-
There's no one way to do it so that question can't really be answered. It depends on the set you're looking at.
-
12 minutes ago, texifornia said:
Well, sounds like you have it figured out you dumbshit.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, sushihorn said:
Perfect. Great to have visual confirmation that the SEC does indeed do less with more. Or should that be:
SEC: It Just Wastes More (talent)
So the SEC took their 2-to-1 NFL combine talent advantage and went 1-3 against the Big 12 in bowl games. Interesting.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Hagbard Celine said:
welp, it's popular to hate on scum. but a scum free of ucl encumbrance is just that more dangerous in the league.
Hopefully they put all their energy into their next league match. Ha.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Is he still dead?
-
9
-
1
-
Who can forget those recent Longhorn internet campaigns such as:
Roger Clemens - He should be in the Hall of Fame, it's a conspiracy!
Lance Armstrong - Why is the media against him? He's really a great guy!
Cedric Benson - He's just misunderstood, repeatedly!
Russell Erxleben - It wasn't his fault!-
2
-
-
27 minutes ago, AustinMT said:
Will be fun to watch.
What I find interesting on this thread is that if he'd transferred to UT instead of OU (or come here originally) we'd be talking about how great he is and what a good pro QB he will be. Much like Mayfield last year -- if he'd been OUR douchebag QB we'd all have loved him....
"What I find interesting on this thread is this alternate reality I've made up in my head that actually has nothing to do with this thread."
Yes, because Texas internet boards have always done nothing but cheer on former Longhorns doing stupid things. Oh wait, no they haven't.
-
3
-
-
Our domination of State of Texas elite collegiate athletics teams in these sports is nearly unique. Here are the states with multiple schools, I've included Texas again so it's all in one spot. Warning, major data longcat ahead. The basic summary is that the only other schools showing such in-state dominance are Ohio State and LSU. Pretty much everyone would consider those two to be the only actual major college sports programs in their respective states. Hmm. Our in-state dominance over other schools is absolutely unique for places with multiple P5 schools, with Alabama and maybe Indiana being somewhat close, or at least in the same zip code. My other takeaway is that Virginia and Washington should be embarrassed.
Alabama:
1. Alabama - 26.5 2. Auburn - 7.5 Arizona:
1. Arizona State - 19.5 2. Arizona - 15 California:
1. Southern Cal - 37.25 2. UCLA - 24 3. Stanford - 15 4. Cal State-Fullerton - 10 5. California - 9.5 6. San Francisco - 3 7t. Fresno State - 2 7t. Long Beach State - 2 7t. Pepperdine - 2 7t. Santa Clara - 2 11t. Cal State-Los Angeles - 1 11t. California-Irvine - 1 Colorado:
1. Denver - 15 2. Colorado College - 10 3. Colorado - 6 Connecticut:
1. Connecticut - 5 2. Quinnipiac - 2 3. Yale - 2 Florida:
1. Miami (FL) - 23 2. Florida State - 22.5 3. Florida - 19.5 4t. Jacksonville - 1 4t. Rollins - 1 Georgia:
1. Georgia - 14 2. Georgia Tech - 6 Illinois:
1. Illinois - 7 2. Southern Illinois - 4 3. Bradley - 3 4. DePaul - 2 5. Loyola-Chicago - 2 Indiana:
1. Notre Dame - 25.5 2. Indiana - 9.5 3. Butler - 2 4. Purdue - 2 5. Indiana State - 1 Iowa:
1. Iowa - 6 2. Iowa State - 2 3. Drake - 1 4. Iowa Preflight - 1 Kansas:
1. Kansas - 15 2. Wichita State - 7 3. Kansas State - 4 Kentucky:
1. Kentucky - 17 2. Louisville - 8 3. Western Kentucky - 1 Louisiana:
1. LSU - 23 2. Louisiana-Lafayette - 1 Maryland:
1. Maryland - 5 2. Navy - 4.5 Massachusetts:
1. Boston College - 25.5 2. Boston U. - 22 3. Harvard - 13 4. Holy Cross - 4 5t. Massachusetts - 1 5t. Massachusetts-Lowell - 1 5t. Northeastern - 1 Michigan:
1. Michigan - 44 2. Michigan State - 29 3. Michigan Tech - 10 4. Lake Superior State - 4 5t. Northern Michigan - 3 5t. Western Michigan - 3 7t. Eastern Michigan - 1 7t. Ferris State - 1 Minnesota:
1. Minnesota - 26 2. Minnesota-Duluth - 6 3. Bemidji State - 1 4. St. Cloud State - 1 Mississippi:
1. Mississippi - 5 2. Mississippi State - 4 Missouri:
1. Missouri - 6 2. Saint Louis - 1 Nebraska:
1. Nebraska - 11.5 2. Creighton - 1 3. Omaha - 1 New Hampshire:
1. New Hampshire - 7 2. Dartmouth - 6 New Jersey:
1. Rutgers - 2 2t. Princeton - 1 2t. Seton Hall - 1 New York:
1t. Cornell - 9 1t. St. Lawrence - 9 1t. Syracuse - 9 4. Clarkson - 7 5. Army - 5.5 6t. RPI - 5 6t. St. John's - 5 8. NYU - 4 9t. CCNY - 2 9t. Union - 2 11t. Colgate - 1 11t. Fordham - 1 11t. RIT - 1 11t. St. Bonaventure - 1 North Carolina:
1. North Carolina - 26.5 2. Duke - 18 3. North Carolina State - 4 4. Wake Forest - 3 5. Charlotte - 1 Ohio:
1. Ohio State - 32.5 2. Cincinnati - 6 3t. Bowling Green - 2 3t. Miami (OH) - 2 5t. Dayton - 1 5t. Ohio - 1 Oklahoma:
1. Oklahoma - 33.75 2. Oklahoma State - 20 3. Tulsa - 3 Oregon:
1. Oregon State - 7.5 2. Oregon - 7 Pennsylvania:
1. Penn State - 15.5 2. Pittsburgh - 7 3. Villanova - 6 4. Temple - 3 5t. La Salle - 2 5t. Lafayette - 2 7t. Duquesne - 1 7t. Pennsylvania - 1 9. St. Joseph's - 0 Rhode Island:
1. Providence - 6 2. Brown - 3 South Carolina:
1. South Carolina - 10 2. Clemson - 8 3. Coastal Carolina - 1 Tennessee:
1. Tennessee - 15 2. Memphis - 3 3. Vanderbilt - 3 Texas:
1. Texas - 44 2. Houston - 7 3. TCU - 6 4. Baylor - 4 5t. Rice - 3 5t. SMU - 3 7t. Randolph Field - 1 7t. Texas A&M - 1 7t. Texas-Pan American - 1 7t. UTEP - 1 Utah:
1. Utah - 6.5 2. Brigham Young - 1 Virginia:
1. Virginia - 5 2t. George Mason - 1 2t. Virginia Commonwealth - 1 2t. Virginia Tech - 1 Washington:
1. Washington - 5 2. Washington State - 3 3t. Gonzaga - 1 3t. Seattle - 1 Wisconsin:
1. Wisconsin - 18 2. Marquette - 3 -
2
-
-
The vision of some smartass NBA player testing this theory out in the near future at the end of a blowout game is too good to pass up. I hope someone does it.
Although I'm assuming the actual wording of the rules allows the refs to differentiate between "intentional loss of control" and actual loss of control.
~95K noncitizens registered to vote, ~58k voted in the last Texas election
in Cloak Room
Posted · Edited by Huckleberry
As I posted on here before, the entire thing was so stupid that anyone who was suckered by that headline should be neutered and have their voting rights rescinded. The headline was essentially that 95,000 people who weren't citizens in the mid-90s are now registered to vote.
Well no fucking shit. Again, there are thousands and thousands (maybe millions) of people who are now registered to vote who weren't even alive in the mid-90s. LIVING DEAD VOTER FRAUD!!!