Posts posted by Huckleberry
-
-
-
-
-
Most of us have always deployed it objectively. The UVA Rolling Stone story had bullshit called on it within 20 posts IIRC. There was arguing on that thread only because a couple of posters intentionally turn their bullshit detectors off when it comes to sexual assault claims.Just wanted to note that we flagged the “hmmm....something smells about this one” back around post 76 (I read the first info about the victims and posted about it, Lat followed with his concerns not long after). Historically, we’re not too bad at sniffing bullshit like this out. Hell, see how the initial reaction to the Jussie Smollett report around here was “yeah, that sounds fishy AF.” Pretty decent bullshit detectors around these parts, when we deploy them objectively. -
Your general pessimism and negativity is one thing, but I've had about enough of your British spellings here lately, sir. You are on notice.We'd have to remodel the bathrooms.
Not joking, btw. The rumour back when he was at KU was that their athletic department spent ~5 grand on custom plumbing to install an industrial-grade bidet that could hold his weight in the coaches' restroom. -
-
2 hours ago, Valmy77 said:
We are on our way though. It is very frustrating to see.
https://texassports.com/sports/2013/7/27/FB_0727133417.aspx
There you go.
-
-
-
-
-
It just seems selfish to surprise people with information they may not want after all these years. Suppose your father had been one of her 2 living sons and suppose he had a wife and kids. That news could break up a marriage and destroy a family. And for what purpose?
Obviously it's selfish because it's based on self-interest. But it's also absolutely not wrong.
None of us chose to be born. However, the vast majority of births were because a man and woman chose to have sex. Once you make that decision and a human being results then tough shit if that human someday wants to know more about their personal and genetic history. The child didn't force you to get your dick wet.
There are of course rare cases where the pregnancy was due to rape or where the revelation could carry a significant risk of abuse or violence. But that still doesn't make it wrong for a child to seek out their history.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11 hours ago, satyanash said:
I think with what we're losing, next year could be the 2007 to our 2006. Lot of youth in starting positions and trying to adjust. The 2007 team also had to replace a lot of experienced starters while keeping the same QB, and although we still went 10-3 it definitely felt like it wasn't as strong a season overall. Obviously it was a prelude to a very strong 2008 (2020 equivalent) team, but I'm not sure where that leaves us going into next season. S&P+ seems to acknowledge this as well by being bearish on us, although maybe to too great a degree, and it looks like FPI does so as well. The models may be reinforcing my prognostication, not creating them.
The 2007 team was pretty much exactly as good as the 2006 team.
-
Yep, it needs to be a major focus of the citizens instead of a topic that's brought up only in small corners of the internet inhabited by smarter than average people. It's a disgusting practice and it should be an easy sell that foodie should only apply to possessions and funds proven to be acquired via illegal activity of which the defendant was found guilty.


Skilling is out
in Daily Texan