Bullshit. An expanded playoff would not do anything to kill the regular season. The only thing that it theoretically adversely effects are some of the Bowl Games but those are already exhibition matches, as they have always been, and you need not look further than the fact that every year more NFL prospects are skipping these "optional" games. A real, true playoff, not this slightly altered version of the BCS, completely changes that. How exactly would the regular season be compromised this year if we had 2 additional teams in the playoff, or 4?
And you keep pointing to losses being the defining factor for the committee, while you are completely missing the fact that 3 of your 11 wins have absolutely zero weight. Yet you think that somehow proves that EVERYONE should schedule worthless, meaningless games? Furthermore, what good does it do your team to play a team like Austin Peay? What did your team learn from that experience, a 45-0 shutout against a completely overmatched team?
"Strength of Schedule" is an inherently flawed metric, and it is based in subjectivity, just like the selection committee. You are arguing for the subjectivity that fits your particular narrative and decrying the one that does not.
And Notre Dame does not attempt to schedule the best 6 loss P5 teams to fill their schedule. That is just a stupid comment. These schedules are made years in advance, and Stanford, USC, and FSU were not 6 loss P5 teams at that time. Maybe they are just really good at predicting the future though. They are leprechaun's after all.