I think this is the best case for Kobe is ability to play through a bunch of nagging injuries and situation including a trial for raping a girl. Kawhi is brittle, no doubt. He'll have to live with that rep his entire career and life. It's part of his legacy, but when on the court.... at the heights of their skills, Kawhi was better and frankly, it's close, but not that close.
Kobe also quit on his team twice in the playoffs.
Close. Really his apex window was a decade, a lot longer than Kawhi's with a clunker thrown in the middle. So, yea..... if you're considering drafting to start a team and those are your two choices or you need someone for the season and don't want to risk injury or can't have rest games from your star, then I agree Kobe is your guy. Kobe definitely had more charisma as Kawhi has the personality of a used condom and Kobe got to play for the shiny and sexy organization of the league, the Lakers. Would we think of him different if he was in Charlotte? Probably.
These were simply the best continuous 5 years of his career. You could pick his Shaq years if you wanted or only the 3rd year if you wanted and statistically all what would happen is he'd look less comparable to Kawhi. His playoff numbers would be a bit higher but not as good as his regular season numbers and nowhere in any stratosphere with Kawhi's. Kobe's best argument lies in his amazing longevity, certain performances which are more specific. He was a great player for a long time, but like almost every great player, needed very good supporting casts around him. Although I think it was a down year in the league, Kawhi carrying Toronto to a championship is by far the more impressive achievement for each. Kobe will go down as the greater player, for his longevity. But again, we're talking about peaks.