Jump to content

LTbear

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2537
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

4790 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I literally am an idiot or I'm missing an inside joke. I have no clue. I'm under 40 and also have no clue
  2. Because they lost one less game. You're welcome.
  3. Who the fuck is this
  4. Sorry I can't read all this text over the sound of your avatar
  5. It's wild. As far as I remember, he's legitimately been a solid poster before this. But he got swept up in the frenzy.
  6. This x 100
  7. So which ND win is better than Georgia? Or Vanderbilt?
  8. Logic is not @Incredulity's strong suit
  9. Did I remember wrong? Did they or did they not drop a single place? A team that wasn't in the field before the CCG still not being in the field after the CCG is not being "punished." Scandalous? My man, you're normally a much better poster than this. If they hadn't released rankings at all until the final one, you'd be only 10% as pissy.
  10. How did they punish UVA? UVA wasn't in the field prior to the championship game. They had to play themselves in. They didn't.
  11. Bama has better wins. Much better. ND is hanging their hat on "good losses." Every playoff ranking has often come down to who you beat. ND beat no one of relevance. I'm not a Bama fan. ND, Bama, Miami, BYU - I can see arguments for all. But not punishing a team for playing in their CCG that was in the rankings before said CCG seems fine to me.
  12. Correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure BYU fell only one spot for losing their CCG, same as Ohio State. So how is that "punishing" them?
  13. If the SEC lobbied for one full member over another full member?
  14. Because the ACC should have lobbied for ND, a partial member, over Miami, a full member. Obviously.
×
×
  • Create New...