Jump to content

LTbear

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2258
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LTbear

  1. That's literally the entirety of what I was saying, just worded simpler. So you didn't mind what I said but it was the tone that bothered ya 😆
  2. Hmmm, did I act like any of my schools "matter?" Getting your panties in a twist over some factual information is quite aggy-esque though. You're succeeding.
  3. It's ridiculous that I'm hoping Cal gets into the ATLANTIC Coast Conference.
  4. Ya fair enough but at some point the right coaching hire will be made. From the outside it seems UT has suffered from 1) always recruiting the highest stars and not necessarily the best fits, and 2) gameday coaching errors from multiple coaches.
  5. I think - but am by no means sure - that Clemson used to have different colors (way back in the day), but something about how the old uniforms faded made them switch to what the faded ones looked like. I only remember this because previously I'd wondered how the hell someone ever chose orange and purple as their color combo.
  6. Obviously a good avenue to choose. I'm curious to see how NIL goes. Before NIL, being honest, I think UT would be somewhat screwed in the SEC (not completely, but I'm sure we'd both agree there are plenty of SEC programs who will cheat through the nose). NIL - as long as it stays somewhat unregulated - I think could level a lot of that playing field, because certainly UT has boosters that can compete with anyone.
  7. May be - that was a great team. As a neutral observer, the Tech game that year was amazing. But as a neutral fan, watching Tech proceed to get skull-fucked by OU shortly thereafter was also hilarious.
  8. What have I been saying? That UT has really underperformed in some metrics. What's one way of showing that? Comparing conference titles against a team that was a doormat for half of the lifetime of the conference. Again, quite getting so easily offended. Sip some whiskey. Saying "UT has really underperformed relative to its resources for quite a while, really ever since Royal in mot respects" is not a statement that any rational person on this site would have the slightest disagreement with.
  9. I'm stating clear facts. You're getting offended that you don't like them. I also have a low tolerance for BS. UT is one of the most successful programs in the country. Relative to the others it shares air with, it's largely underperformed in NC's and Heismans. You could make any argument about conference titles but that's definitely more a my lifetime thing.
  10. I didn't have too much of a point - this convo started a page or so back, I commented that UT had underperformed relative to its resources and as compared to its peer programs, and a couple of people got hyper-offended by it. Yes, y'all should have won a couple more. Since Royal UT has seemed to often win games but not capture the big stuff. 2005 and obvious and awesome exception. Anyways, I was only talking facts of UT football, not trying to offend a few people.
  11. Can you explain how your post here relates to UT's number of Big XII titles? I'm failing to make that connection. Thanks in advance. Again, try not to get so easily offended and defensive. It's very aggy-esque.
  12. Don't get so easily offended and defensive - that really sounds like Aggy. As I said in my later post you replied to, UT underperforms historically in NCs and Heismans relative to the other mega-brands. Conference titles they've done really well historically, though obviously the last 20 years has been slow.
  13. Ironic you mention reading comprehension - I said in another post UT had had one good run in my lifetime (Brown). How was the 80's and early to mid 90's? Anyways, UT underperforms relative to their resources, in a weird way - very good in number of wins, subpar in Heismans and national titles relative to your peer programs. I'm not. Hope the home is treating you well my friend.
  14. You and I must frequent the same other board.
  15. Sure, are those on Amazon? But hey, still, sorry your team hasn't won any more Big XII titles than Baylor, hope you'll be ok.
  16. Fair enough. I'd just never heard "Oklahoma was less racist" as an answer to anything.
  17. One such era in my lifetime. And I'm not meaning to diminish the Brown years, but only two conference titles? However I'll happily admit that 2005 UT was one of the better teams I've seen in my entire lifetime, and that title game was probably the best of my lifetime (hard to beat not only because of the game itself, but because of the season-long buildup when it was so clear who the top two teams were).
  18. Also, just to recognize that I wasn't overlooking this part of the sorry: fair.
  19. I'm asking about the UT football program in direct comparison to OU's. Can you not read?
  20. So... Texas was just more racist?
  21. Ya but that's kinda the issue, isn't it? Outside of the Royal years Texas is generally massively underperforming relative to its resources. No way Oklahoma should be so dramatically more successful than UT over the course of history. (Texas of course doesn't underperform as badly as Aggy, which absolutely takes the cake in that regard).
  22. You find that funny? Might want to seek help my friend.
  23. Two conference titles since UT's last. And Baylor has three in that span... tying UT's total number of Big XII titles. Which I find hilarious.
  24. 61 - 54 2010 2–6 2011 4–5 2012 5–4 2013 7–2 2014 5–4 2015 4–5 2016 3–6 2017 5–4 2018 7–2 2019 5–4 2020 5–3 2021 3–6 2022 6–3
×
×
  • Create New...