Okay, I know this probably won't do my karma any favors, but what is the case against Acevedo here? I get that he got out in front of it as it it was a legit raid and the cops were injured by violent drug dealing thugs, but I think that probably says more about the information that was being fed to him by those involved in the aftermath of the raid than anything else. I doubt he was involved in the day-to-day dealings of the narcotics unit, other than seeing their stats. Once the real facts started coming to light, he was quick to acknowledge the fault of the officers and to start making the necessary change to ensure that this doesn't happen. Cynics (myself included) can argue that this is all window dressing to try to get the media frenzy to blow over before he is forced out of a job. Even still, that's more than you hear from most chiefs of police when shit like this happens. Circling the hero wagons doesn't seem to be his top priority as much as cleaning the department and restoring public faith.
My point is that this behavior was present long before Acevedo took the position in Houston. As far as I can tell, this is the first egregious abuse of power that has come to light under his watch and he seems to be making efforts to correct it (calling out officers misconduct, working with the DA to bring about criminal charges, calling out the POU, eliminating/severely limiting no-knock raids going forward, etc.). He's making the right moves in my mind, with the only thing I'd ask for more of is a 3rd party investigation by the Texas Rangers. If he can fix this issue and can drive out the bad actors in the department, I'd have to change my opinion of him as it relates to policing.