Jump to content

udaydanceparty

Full Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    258

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by udaydanceparty

  1. udaydanceparty
  2. udaydanceparty
    Then we are on the same page. As long as the SCOTUS judges aren't engaging in judicial activism, their political affiliation shouldn't matter. Kennedy is a good example of that.
  3. udaydanceparty
    Is that prison lingo?
  4. udaydanceparty
  5. udaydanceparty
    Then you'd get rid of a vast majority of all abortions. https://www.actionlife.org/index.php/life-issues/abortion/item/124-the-real-reason-women-choose-abortion
  6. udaydanceparty
    I'd consider myself Pro-Life and I think there are conditions where terminating a pregnancy is ethical and morally acceptable. I guess I should also repeat myself by saying life doesn't begin at conception IMO.
  7. udaydanceparty
    So you have a checklist that would include a heartbeat as a criteria for nixing the abortion. Anyone want to counter why that shouldn't be the case? All i'm doing is framing the discussion so it's more constructive. I don't think most people realize how much common ground rationale people have and the political BS causes us to talk past eachother.
  8. udaydanceparty
    In principle we are in agreement though correct? The way i'd approach this issue is to set certain checkmarks for development and if you find them, an abortion should be illegal. That's no different than how it currently is btw..
  9. udaydanceparty
    At some point between conception and it's 18th birthday it becomes a living human being with it's own rights. Killing a human being is against the law and it should be. The argument really needs to be defining the point at which it's no longer a clump of cells and becomes a human. Personally, I don't believe that point is at conception but I also don't think you suddenly become human upon passing through the birth canal. I think most people share that view but I could be wrong.
  10. udaydanceparty
    So both sides?
  11. udaydanceparty
    The president's critics have already become the exact same thing they accused the president's supporters of being.
  12. udaydanceparty
    It depends on who they are stacking them with. If they are stacking them with judicial activists, then no.. i'm not okay with that. I'd much rather have a court that is predictable and consistent. I don't want a judge that puts their 2 cents interpretation on every piece of legislation and tries to change it to suit what's best for their political side. I asked before if anyone had a reason why they didn't like any of the front runners. So far it's just cliche generalizations about the coming apocalypse.
  13. udaydanceparty
    Maybe if you include all the illegals but they shouldn't be voting. Interestingly enough, Trump seems to be making decisions in a very pragmatic way and siding with populists on pretty much every issue. It's almost as if he isn't an ideologue and is listening to what a majority of people want.
  14. udaydanceparty
    Worst Hitler ever
  15. udaydanceparty
    You can argue that it a restrains the will of the majority. Why do you hate minorities?
  16. udaydanceparty
    Senate, House and Presidency are all leaning Red. That's the will of the people.
  17. udaydanceparty
    What are the complaints about the current crop of potential replacements? Are they racist, sexists and/or homophobic Nazis? I am genuinely curious because so far all the complaints i've been reading are criticisms of a dark future that people are imagining is on the horizon.
  18. udaydanceparty
    You must be white.
  19. udaydanceparty
    Considering the disproportionate number of blacks that are killed by abortions in this country every year, are we really sure Nazi Trump will appoint someone who would overturn Roe v Wade? Right now it's about 870 black babies per day, you'd think a racist like Trump would want to keep that Eugenics program going.
  20. udaydanceparty
    Everyone needs to calm down about the impact on Roe. It's just a clump of words barely in it's 137th trimester.
  21. udaydanceparty
    Yeah I can't support that attitude. If he's a good judge he should be voted in.
  22. udaydanceparty
    Bookies currently have Brett Kavanaugh and Thomas Hardiman as the most likely replacements.
  23. udaydanceparty
    It probably has something to do with that 3 month vacation the supreme court takes every year. https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2018TermCourtCalendar.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/2017TermCourtCalendar.pdf
  24. udaydanceparty
    I think you mean the 70s right? the violence of the 70s resulted in Reagan/Bush living in the white house for 12 years. People just need to show up at the ballot box and get involved in government if they don't like the direction the country is headed. This violence rhetoric is undermining the democratic candidates this fall.
  25. udaydanceparty
    He is powerless to stop it at this point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qduJjDJnQfo

Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!

×
×
  • Create New...