OK... so I asked more about it and am working on countering his arguments... he's an attorney if that provides any perspective or maybe it doesn't mean anything because what does these days with Trump supporters?
I asked why she presented a threat to civilization...
"The lawfare that has been practiced by the current administration against Trump (and even against Musk by CA regulators) is the biggest threat to the rule of law not Trump. Show me the man and I'll find you the crime. There is a far bigger threat to the rule of law state than Mr. Trump."
So I responded back with consequences of his actions, history of being crooked, skirting rules, breaking laws, grifter, blah blah blah, etc. I mentioned Musk is not on the ballot. I also referenced Mark Milley, Mattis, most of his cabinet, etc. coming out against him.
Response
"So you are telling me that you don't think suspending the statute of limitations in NY state for a year so that a lady could file a claim against Trump from 1975 over a Bergdorff Goodman alleged rape that she told no one about and didn't report to the police before having the SOL revert back to its normal 10-year period is not something out of the KGB playbook. Show me the man and I'll find you the crime. The legislature in that instance particularly enacted this legislation to get Trump."
Can't speak to the background on the E. Jean Carroll case but why are we talking about a state court case here?
AND he then said I was being influenced by TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome)
F me...
Anyway, I dug up our WhatsApp conversation from January 10, 2021 where he admitted I was right about him the whole time. Screenshot and sent to him. I told you... you eventually saw through him, you can still see through him. Best I can do is throw his words back in his face.