How was my response to you in any way an Ad Hominem attack? It was the literal opposite, with it starting with an explicit statement that the POST is stupid. Not you, the poster.
This was your original post:
In the context of this conversation, please tell us how we could have "built anything we wanedt" and not have sacrificed money that would be used for NIL, other athletic facilities, etc. "We could have built anything we wanted" is a child's answer, and using A&M, the poster child for being in a financial clusterfuck in their athletic department as an example of how to "do whatever you want" is a laughably poor position to attempt to defend.
If you don't want criticism of the post, then why don't you illustrate how we could have "built anything we wanted" and financed it in a way that didn't involve boosters and didn't take funds from the athletic department that could be used for other things. I'm listening.