Trump is also the devil they know. They lived with him for 4 years as he banned mulsim entry into their country and stoked race violence in other races. They resoundingly voted against him in 2020, becuase they saw the devil they knew fucking sucked. And they've had a year of being able to listen to the things coming out of his own mouth that he'll do to escalate the situation in Gaza and make things harder on Muslims in the US. So lets not pretend it's some unknowable risk. It's a knowable risk, and that risk also can't stop running his mouth about all the shit he will do when elected. Your illustration here is borderline bad faith.
Again, characterizing this as a risky trade-off is absurd at best, intentionally decieving at worst. As Fooster's said, please, outline all the various trade-offs, pros and cons, etc. If they're not acting emotionally, or petulantly, then how do you square the measured and thoughtful response to voting for a man who says "He will increase aid to Israel and he will deport all the mulsims/immigrants/browns from this country, and intern them in the process?