SydneyCarton

I’m not sure being dumb and having a shitty memory is the flex you think it is, bud.

Didn’t you have to live in one of your mom’s rental houses after your life collapsed, from all the gay sex and drugs, and you cheating on the wife who you then blamed for all of your bad decisions in life? Your equally fascist brother had no qualms repeatedly coming on here and taunting your ass for this behavior. Did your bank account come from mommy too? I think we all know the answer.

That's like scolding someone for putting ice on their hand after they got burned. The damage is done. The fight is over. At least until there's another kind of fighting, if that ever happens. It's stupid to look at this cabinet and the project 2025 shit coming to the forefront now in plain sight and think otherwise. People scolding us now, lolz.

The Serrano is good, but the Trader Joe's green dragon is even better, imo, if there is a TJ's in Iowa. Habanero and Ghost Pepper are the two best Yellowbird, IMO.

I realize the futility of this question before I ask, but can someone explain to me what this nimrod is saying, exactly? Is he implying our BMD’s suck recruit’s dicks, and this is something all the top tier recruits WANT? Or that they think they made their billions by sucking dick? In just struggling to understand the connection between the success and the sucking dick.

You’re right, I thought the beginners doctor was revoked in 80. Guess we’re all just stupid?

Well it took the overturning of the fairness doctrine to create cable news. It popped up after once Ted Turner realized he could make a profit. And it’s been downhill since. So yeah, you eliminate what can’t fit into the boundaries, or it conforms to the rules. Well, I can think of one way buybacks can be nefarious. When you lay off a fuck ton of employees, then a couple weeks later say “well, we’ve got all this extra money and nothing to do with it. Buybacks I guess.”

Messaging doesn’t matter when they never hear your message.

And they didn’t just win, they pistol whipped democrats across the board. So I guess they showed you whose balls. You can be infuriated and indignant all you want, but that ad blitz just took and sustained every branch of government, which historically is pretty rare. im sure theyre happy with their investment dollars. Are you happy with the result of the record breaking donations to Act Blue? Seems like a shit ROI to me.

I referenced this in my federal voting laws post. States do what they want but there needs to be uniform reporting guidelines. Shockingly no one responded on my post.

No one will answer that question here

The democratic platform is soup to nuts a fucking loser. The American public just told everyone paying attention that fact. It’s a fucking loser. All branches of government and a popular vote fucking loss. How many people here would have bet their life savings that Trump loses the popular vote, even if he lost the presidency? Every motherfucker that posts in the CR. You can blame low educated voters. You can blame a media based on profit versus informing citizens. You can blame whoever the fuck you want. But it’s a fucking loser. That video Bo&W posted was right; introspection. You can’t make changes if you don’t win, and you’re not winning on your current platform. this isn’t a rah rah post for the right. It’s just a fact. Loser platform. 50% of white women said fuck off. 45% of Latinos said go fuck yourself. Young men of all demographics said eat my ass. Blaming messaging and libsplaining some principle skinner bullshit. “Oh if they just didn’t understand.” America is fucking dumb. You can’t make them understand. Stop trying. Figure out a new platform and new messaging because America sucks right now. And the right sucks balls too but at the end of the day no one seems fucking happy except the trolls over here dunking on their day of identity politics victory.

Iran was progressing upward like a motherfucker right until the 60’s. What happened? Assuming bumps in the road don’t become chasms is not a guarantee.

Educate yourself. They didn’t trim fat. They trimmed core employees in charge of product in a profitable section of alphabet to then do massive buybacks. She’s only asking for the religious because everyone else has an existing framework. It’s called laws and the legal system. We’re all subject to it. The problem is that despite a Legal separation of church and state, at least in the condition, some people insist of also subject their personal moral compass onto others who don’t share that religion. Which makes it oppression when they try to make universal laws based on their religious morality. There won’t. Why don’t companies enforce the laws on the books now? This new regime will have all 3 branches of government, including both chambers of congress. They will have a popular vote mandate. What conclusions will you draw personally if they do NOT enforce the laws on the books currently?

Can we ban brisket from this thread? He’s ruining whatever minuscule chance there is for talking. I’d like a R voter to speak on my policy points.

A shockingly small percentage of people.

Yeah. They meant young people and women and that got shot to shit on Tuesday. So did Latino vote. What else you got?

I'll add another one. A company that performs massive layoffs shouldn't be allowed to perform stock buybacks. FUcking at all. What Google did was criminal this past year. If you lay off some massive percentage of your workforce you should be able to do stock buybacks for like 10 fucking years.

First, it's illegal for illegal immigrants to vote in elections, so #2 makes zero sense. But more to the point, even if you were right, if "everyone gets something they want" then why is there an outrage over illegal immigration?

I can put forth a ton of policies, but what's the point the politicians on either side will never for for it? -Federal Voting Guidelines: States can run elections but there are certian rules on when/how absentee ballots are voted, so there is NO CONFUSION or gray area on "election theft" -Ranked Choice Voting -Districts are drawn with guidelines by computers to prevent partisan gerrymandering -Supreme Courts not being a lifetime appointment -Return Manufacturing to the US, even at a fucking loss, because of National Security Issues. We subsidize ariline failure, lets subsidize manufacturing -Teachers and Police officers should be paid extremely high salaries, becuase educating and protecting is important, and right now intelligent and ethical people do other things becuase it's barely a living wage or a thankless profession that has become populated by bullies. Have to attract talent, EVEN AT AN ECONOMIC LOSS -We need a new, fairer tax code. A fucking relatively simple one that isn't so easy for the wealthy to sidestep. That's my start. Ranked choice voting will eliminate the fucking fringe lunatics from each side who typically, currently, win their fucking primaries. FUCK PRIMARIES. You want to fix America, start fucking there.

This thead is worthless. There's not a real dialog. The first few pages were shitposters, and the last few are Brisket shitposting.

Sure man, I agree with that. But the whole point of this thread was transparency and finding commonality. Not just doing what you think is bettering, but working to find commonality in the good with people you disagree with...so it's a fundamental quesiton. Sure, you can all feed the homless and candy stripe in cancer wards. But the overarching question of "what happens when 50% of the people think the good you're doing is wrong" needs to be answered if you're attempting to build a relationship with those you disagree with. etc.

If you're suggesting we follow only the example of teaching and Jesus, well, I've got to say, that doesn't sound like finding a truce with the people I have different feelings with should be on the table. By your definition.

I know you are, but I'm being clear for the sake of the thread. Not that it hasn't just mostly been other folks looking to show up and dunk and be assholes. To the victor go the spoils, I guess, which isn't a terribly surprising attitude.

How can a large segment of society work to make the world a better place, when a larger majority of people believe his specific efforts to make the world a better place are, in fact, making the world worse? "Oh, you volunteered your legal efforts pro bono to illegal immegrants? Yeah, you're fucking part of the problem." When people can't agree on a common concept of what makes the world a better place, how is anyone supposed to operate? And don't fucking say "Do what you think is best" becuase clearly that isn't/hasn't worked.