Jump to content

NotActuallyALonghorn

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    5779
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NotActuallyALonghorn

  1. Prince Harry actually served in a combat tour in Afghanistan, so he deserves a little respect for that at least.
  2. At least whatever it was is on board with your management strategy.
  3. I can reply now. I couldn't earlier. I had at least two witty comments that deserved rep, so can we get back rep?
  4. Yeah, but that is assuming they use logic and reasoning to guide their decisions. If all they know is mafia type tactics, but their decisions are guided by religious fanaticism, then you could easily get this. I'm not saying it is likely, but it wouldn't be particularly surprising, given that they've already basically gotten away with bribing FIFA to get the WC and using slave labor to build their stadiums.
  5. I actually prefer coffee that has been sitting on the plate for a few hours, but maybe I am weird. Of course it never lasts that long at home, but occasionally I'll find a pot that has been sitting there for a few hours at work. With the crappy Folgers they have at work, it really improves the flavor.
  6. You're assuming they are competent and know anything other than mafia type tactics.
  7. Probably these: Sometimes made with some sort of weight like a steel or lead ball in the center.
  8. I mean, we have writers here. We just need to get one or more on board to come up with a proper screenplay and then shop it out or however it works.
  9. The abuse of too and to in this post is a good example of FA. Maybe there will be a FO?
  10. I'm pretty sure there's a thread for that in IPIHB.
  11. I think your gonna have to tag one of the mods to get them to change it. For now, any real discussion of the show probably needs to be in spoilers, but maybe after a few weeks when people have had a chance to watch it all we can get them to add a "spoilers starting on page 2 (or 3 or whatever)" tag to the title and discuss it openly.
  12. Some assembly required, but the fit is supposed to be extremely good, so it's mainly just finishing the wood and metal bits to how you like them. https://kiblerslongrifles.com/products/woodsrunner-rifle-kit-pre-order?variant=39687164821622
  13. Yeah, this isn't exactly the kind of show that lends itself well to threads where people might be at different stages of watching it. I enjoyed it.
  14. 95% of the squares on the front line can easily be identified as to whether or not they have a mine just from what you can see from what is already revealed there.
  15. You could start dang near anywhere.
  16. Even if your old cord worked fine, go by a new one. The newer galaxies are a lot more finicky about that stuff. I'd either just get a Samsung cord, or do some reading about which brands work best with the S22's specifically with Android auto.
  17. I got that, I was just under the impression that if you put a rifle upper on it that is too big for it to be shot with one hand easily then it would show intent to shoulder it even with the brace and they would then classify it as a rifle, and once a rifle always a rifle. After looking it up, the once a rifle always a rifle part is wrong, as I posted from the ATF website. However, with the new rules (should they actually pass muster) they would probably classify it as a rifle as long as the rifle length upper is attached, but there is nothing wrong with converting it back to a pistol, so there should be no worries keeping the original pistol length upper. If the once a rifle always a rifle bit was true, then you could get into trouble keeping the short upper unless you had another lower that was a pistol lower or an SBR lower. But it's not true, so he would be free to switch it back and forth.
  18. Ok, I found the proper answer. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/can-i-lawfully-make-pistol-rifle-without-registering-firearm Can I lawfully make a pistol into a rifle without registering that firearm? Assuming that the firearm was originally a pistol, the resulting firearm, with an attached shoulder stock, is not an NFA firearm if it has a barrel of 16 inches or more in length. Pursuant to ATF Ruling 2011-4, such rifle may later be unassembled and again configured as a pistol. Such configuration would not be considered a “weapon made from a rifle” as defined by 26 U.S.C. § 5845(a)(4). [26 U.S.C. § 5845, 27 CFR § 479.11]
  19. It's probably not discussed here much because it is on HBO and this is the Netflix thread.
  20. Yeah, but putting a carbine upper on it makes it too unwieldy to shoot with just a brace, which demonstrates intent to shoulder it, which means it has been redesigned as a rifle and once a rifle, always a rifle, which means you'd better get rid of the 10.5" upper unless you have another pistol lower or and SBR lower or you risk showing constructive intent to create and unregistered SBR.
  21. If you ever instal that upper on it,it becomes forever a rifle and reinstalling the pistol upper makes it an SBR no matter how the brace thing shakes out, if I recall correctly. But who TF even knows anymore?
  22. The new rules are BS, but it isn't too terribly difficult to comply. Not that they will last long. And if you still have the upper than you still have a potential SBR. Much more so if you put actual rifle stocks on all of your lowers. Constructive intent and all that. The best thing to do is run a tight ship and wait.
×
×
  • Create New...