If that is the numbers from PP's statement then yes. As I mentioned, when the numbers are examined (not just by pro-life groups) they are misleading in what PP does. The Washington Post did a good article about this as have others. An example is when someone comes into a PP office to get an abortion, PP counts everything they do for this person (exam, STD testing, consultation, etc) as a separate service. That can add up to calling it 6-10 services for 1 abortion. That's misleading and number playing just to make a point on paper. It's like the NRA saying they exist for hunter safety training.
The current issue with PP is just as much about funding as it is with actual abortion. Again, PP is disingenuous when they say no federal funds (i think they get about $500 million from fed?) are used for abortion, when federal funds are used for other things like the buildings and staff and overhead that wouldn't be there without it. The idea or talking point of they are there and exist as a "women's health provider" is as disingenuous as the "medical marijuana card" some states have had. It might have a few cases where it's true, but that's not the real picture.