Texasrocks

Texas hasn't given up a TD since he left.

Tell me you don't live in West Virginia without telling me you don't live in West Virginia.

I'm trying to think of a valid reason for bailing on our out of town visitors to watch... Austin Peay.

Speaking of which, how has Blake Gideon not gotten more criticism for the safeties performance last year?

With all the talk of how much Sark sucks, I was curious about whether it's better to have an elite offense or defense and be mediocre on the other site. At least over the last few years, lopsided teams with elite defenses seem to have a higher floor than teams with elite offense/bad defense. A top 10 defense and bad offense probably means you are going to finish with 9+ wins and ranked pretty high. Aggy was the worst team with an elite defense last year at 7-4 followed by Clemson and Wisconsin with 9 wins each. It's not as clear with elite offenses. Oklahoma and Ohio State were led by cocksuckers the only elite offense/non-elite defense teams to finish in the top 10. Tennessee was top 5 on offense, 55th on offense, and finished 6-6. On the flip side, there are teams like BYU and Wake Forest that were really good on offense, sucked on defense, and finished with pretty good records. That's a long way of saying maybe we win, maybe we don't, maybe OU can go fuck itself.

Ketch is fist-fighting him, eating him, or both.

Screw that. By this time of year, I'd schedule my whole weekend around a game between two schools I've never even heard of.

Patterson. The word you're looking for is Patterson.

It was best for everyone that Casey moved on, but good luck to him.

Well, Nuke's scared because his eyelids are jammed and his old man's here. We need a live... is it a live rooster?... We need a live rooster to take the curse off Jose's glove! And nobody seems to know what to get Ian or Card for their wedding present.

What led you to that conclusion?

Therein lies the problem. If they had any integrity, they would admit when they don't know something. And clearly identify obvious conflicts of interest like signing an NIL contract with a player they've been reporting on.

Aggy would like a word, sir.

"Sure, I was wrong about the starting QB, but here's every last detail in Sark's decision making process..." posts inbound in 3, 2, 1...

It's not just BO&W, you just described a big chunk of the recruiting board. You also just described a big chunk of the recruiting board.

Don't get me wrong, I think Ewers gives us the best chance to win this year. I assumed he'd overtake Card in August, but it may take longer than that. My point was that Sark should start whoever has earned it regardless of how message boards will react.

If the goal is a full team payout, who cares about the young guys playing early and often?

Another losing season would be devastating. If Card is ahead, he should start. If he shits the bed again, he should be benched. It's that simple. If Ewers comes off the bench for a few games and goes on a tear, no one will care that he didn't start the first game.

My 12 year old resents that remark.

Fuck off. This isn't texags,

It could have been worse, you could have gotten shot down by your own asshole.

Boss Baby said it better: Whether you think you can or you think you can't, you're right.

No way! A site with a forum called, "I'd Pee in Her Butt" isn't a bastion of intellectual discourse?

Sark has a difficult choice here. Does he go with the guy who barks well or the one who consistently completes passes down the field?

FIFY