I haven't gotten through it yet, but what I have read shows that the NCAA is grasping in some areas. There is a part where they use Bill Self wearing an adidas shirt and dollar sign chain as proof that KU knew what was going on. Whether you believe KU was complicit or not, or whether it can be proven that KU was complicit or not, that is absolutely not how you demonstrate a case. I've been told there is another part where they use the Snoop Dogg performance as evidence that KU is guilty. Finally, saying KU is defiant in their knowledge of what was going on as evidence KU is guilty doesn't really smell right. Basically saying "they won't admit guilt so that means they must be guilty."
I also found these quotes on Reddit:
Mike Brey on shoe companies - this is interesting because there is no correspondence between KU coaches and adidas about paying money, just saying "we need guys".
Here is an attorney that argues cases against the NCAA.
I'll probably read the full report this weekend but I'm sure it is filled with exactly what I expect it to be filled with. KU isn't giving an inch and the NCAA is posturing like they know KU is guilty. It'll be interesting to see what evidence they present.