If hard proof of years of child rape doesn't snap them back to reality then nothing will.
It will just be important to constantly remind these pieces of garbage going forward that they support Satan. An entire party who worships money and power, hates the poor (and basically anyone different from them), and condones child sex trafficking.
He could be mentioned zero times in the files. How about just "he was best friends with Jeffrey Epstein for years".
They deemed him unfit for the presidency because they didn't like some things his pastor said.
12 diet cokes, 21 cigs, and a shitpot of sugar. The other day I had one diet coke for the first time in forever, and half an hour later I felt sick to my stomach. I'm not entirely sure that John Daly is human.
Do y'all remember when Patel testified under oath that Epstein didn't traffic girls to anyone but himself? What the hell was that and why did he do that?
Epstein is the most famous sex trafficker in history. That's like saying "I have seen no evidence that Tom Brady ever once threw a football".
His Howard Stern interview from a decade or so ago should be required viewing for everyone. Where he was asked "What's the youngest you would have sex with?", instead of replying "What a disgusting question" or something, he thinks for a second and says "Well I wouldn't have sex with a 12 year-old". The obvious implication is that he has had sex with middle school aged children, but would probably draw the line at 12.
This interview was before he entered politics, and to my knowledge has never been used against him in any campaign.
They actually said "some of the documents". If they are 100% convinced that "some" of them are fake, then it should be pretty easy to let us know which ones they are, and also share the proof of how they know they are fake.
Me: "I'll turn on MSNOW and see if they're covering it...."
First thing I hear: "Will all of this fuel new questions into Trump's supposed playboy lifestyle...?"
I swear to fucking god.
Remember when Trump, the FBI Director, and the Attorney General all got Boebert in the Situation Room, in a desperate attempt to not be legally obligated to release the files? Hurr durr wonder why.
Also, if the DOJ is going to try this "Um, the stuff in there about Trump isn't true, ok?" shit then shouldn't they have to tell us just exactly what isn't true? And how they know this? Or are we just supposed to think every time we see the name Trump in there (tens of thousands of times) 'oh that's right, that part is fake' and skip right over it.