And the media isn't going to stop doing what they do because of an anonymous poster either, and yet you've chosen to focus your energy on the media's perceived lack of coverage about it (which I mostly agree with you about), rather than the sex trafficking itself.
But here's the thing, there have been discussions about sex trafficking. Very recently a rich asshole was busted frequenting those places and taking advantage of sex trafficked women. And guess how many posts there are by you, Newdoc, or the rest of the "the media isn't giving proper coverage to sex trafficking!!" crowd there were on that thread? Zero.
So again, there's a very real discussion to be had about sex trafficking. But it's plain that that's not what's important here, rather that it's just a tool being used to advance a tired anti-media talking point that distracts from real issues that we have as a country. Continued partisan intellectual dishonesty. The media is terrible, but let's not use manufactured outrage about a very real problem to advance our agenda against it. When we do that, we do a disservice to the actual real problems.
FWIW the posts jumping to conclusions about him being a redneck inspired by Q or Trump or whatever are agenda-driven as well and they don't belong here either. It's pretty clear that the dude was just a nutjob who had mommy issues about getting shitty handjobs at massage parlors. His politics don't matter and shouldn't be part of this thread.