No, I'm asking you to prove your original statement which was "They are probably one of the safest non-household indoor spaces in the country when these basic precautions are followed".
If you'd like to change the discussion from:
"They are probably one of the safest non-household indoor spaces in the country when these basic precautions are followed"
to
"a population of largely low transmission risk individuals practicing social distancing, mask wearing, using contact tracing, and quarantine procedures when exposures occur creates a relatively low risk environment."
Then that's fine with me. Those two statements are completely different. I agree with your second statement. I don't agree with your first.
Don't be a bitch and act like I'm the one building straw men. You made a statement, I asked for proof, your proof didn't back your original statement up at all. You pivoted the argument midstream because your first statement was speculation and stupid. You know what you're doing, because while you've proven many times you have no issues arguing from a base of intellectual dishonesty, you aren't dumb.
This is why very few people here want to engage with you. "Be best" as you like to say when you're trying to gaslight people.