appreciate the link. I have to admit that I didn't realize reverse mortgages could be as complex as they describe and how it could function as a HELOC, without that name. I had no idea that you could pull out funds on demand, and optionally pay them back. I was also ignorant that the mortgage loan funds available can increase over time.
Couple of takeaways for me:
they seemed to disagree with the govt describing reverse mortgages as a last resort for retirement income but then they proceed to acknowledge that it is the last resort for many. They specifically said their advice wasn't for the person calling in after watching a Tom Selleck tv ad.
I never thought much about a reverse mortgage as a backup plan for sequence of returns risk. While it seems doable, it feels to me like its too much of a complex financial product for the average consumer to use "correctly."
And if someone had the knowledge and discipline to use it as a risk mitigation plan, I would believe it's a low probability that they would need to do so. That person would most likely be set with more than adequate retirement income.
I didn't know that you have to pay an upfront 2% insurance premium on the value of your house. This insures the mortgage company in case you end up owing more than the value of your house. I believe there is an ongoing premium as well. I assume you can roll the upfront and ongoing premium into the borrowed amount decreasing your equity.
For those using it as a last resort, I could see many spending all of the money ASAP, and ending up broke without any home equity. Yes they can remain in the house as long as they keep up with taxes and HOA fees but I would have to bet this is a more common situation than the savvy retirement investor who continually maximizes the mortgages costs vs stock returns.