Jump to content

jimmyjazz

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    43595
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by jimmyjazz

  1. Well, the HR was kinda big.
  2. God the SEC suckfest by the announcers gets old.
  3. That's an ESPN highlight catch!
  4. Oh YEAH Max! Way to absolve yourself!
  5. What fresh hell is this umpire meeting about? MSU bitchassedness no doubt.
  6. Man, what do you have against Laura Linney?
  7. Some would say Stiles Switch. I haven't had them all, but I've had that one, and it's fantastic.
  8. Josh Pastner did exactly that this morning on ESPN.
  9. What's his pitch count so far? Can he pitch game 3?
  10. That's probably the most succinct way to summarize the "subjective" perspective. I don't necessarily disagree.
  11. No, that's not logical. If you want to bring conference winning % into the discussion, you must include strength of conference. You aren't. You are just so damned determined to be rid of RT (as am I) that you are tilting your arguments in favor of anything that might keep Texas out regardless of what the competing bubble teams did.
  12. Damn that was a helluva pitching job in relief.
  13. Alright, keep the score updates coming at least until the actual SEC Network gets off women's softball.
  14. I have SECN and (most) games I can watch on ESPN+. Not this one.
  15. Did that. No worky. It literally tells me "This Event Has Not Started Yet". Logged out, logged in, browsed to Baseball, selected "see all", clickd on the UT/MSU game. Nothing. ESPN+ can get fucked. It is this flaky for a whole bunch of subscribers.
  16. Jesus I hate ESPN+ No feed.
  17. Let me counter my own point regarding Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 records: If NET ranking is the primary indicator of a team's worth, then UNC should be in ahead of Texas (36 vs 39). The NCAA hasn't said that NET is that metric, though. They do tout quadrant performance, and in THAT world we have it all over UNC. The problem with UNC is that they have a better record against a weaker schedule. So be it. EDIT: for clarity, UNC played 5 more games against Q3/Q4 opponents, AND THEY EVEN LOST ONE OF THEM. We lost none of our Q3/Q4 games, and it's a pretty fair assumption that we wouldn't have lost any of another 5. What would Texas' record look like with 5 fewer Q1/Q2 games and 5 more more Q3/Q4 games? A whole lot better, likely 24-10 or some such. BUT, we can't make that swap, because the SEC is way tougher than the ACC so we get fucked if "noncon" matters. Gah. It's so simple but some of you don't seem to understand the logic.
  18. Who gives a fuck? UNC was 1-12 against Q1 teams. We were 7-10. Does that not tell you something? Gah this argument is insane. I don't give a damn if we get in but stop splitting a total body of work into conference and non-conference, it's stupid and illogical and oh so Texas.
  19. jimmyjazz

    Rush

    Christ. That's what got my dad. Uhhh . . .
  20. If anyone goes "mushroom" and "hot pocket" I'm gonna lose it.
  21. Tre Johnson getting us in would be just as dumb as good wins + bad losses being ignored to leave us out.
  22. Thank God they didn't use any other first letters, it would have been even worse.
×
×
  • Create New...