And who’s fault is it for needing a pavement princess brodozer? Certainly not the manufacturer’s. They build sensible, affordable, and fuel efficient cars, too. They don’t sell in the quantities you think are correct, but who is to blame.
Why would a for profit builder focus on shotgun houses when your money comes in the less costly additional footage? Not to mention that house is likely to get a solid loan from a solid buyer because news flash, people buying high end shit typically are more sorted than those that cannot. What we can all agree to is if that there is more money to be made there, it would be happening. This would be akin to you lowering your hourly rate, while working harder, to accommodate clients who are less likely to pay. Do you practice that way in your practice? Not a one off pro Bono shit you’ve done, have you designed your practice that way for the better good (those that can’t afford 650/hr attorney)?