Okay, so I screwed up a decimal point somewhere in my math and fouled up my entire point. So I will use a different analogy and instead of playing Rene Descartes I will instead play David Attenborough to make my point.
Every year millions and millions of wildebeests migrate across Africa following the rains in search of fresh grass to graze on. Each year thousands and thousands of these wildebeests meet their end along this migration via lions, crocodiles, and other predators. The majority of the eaten are old or sick wildebeest. The wildebeest that finish the migration are rewarded with fresh grass to eat and the herd as a whole is strengthened. Now the wildebeest could just stay where they are at at the start and avoid all the lions and crocodiles that are waiting ahead of them. However they know that there is no grass to eat where they are at and they will all eventually starve (and the old and the sick will be the first to starve).
We are the wildebeest. Coronavirus is the lions and crocodiles and the grass is the economy. Fresh grass is an open, thriving economy. Dead grass is the economy in its current state. We can stay in the dead grass and keep the old and sick from being eaten by the crocodiles and lions. However the entire herd is eventually going to metaphorically starve by doing so (starving being a metaphor for poverty). And the old and the sick will be among the first to fall down this mineshaft of poverty our present actions are putting us on a course for. We are trying to save the old and the sick by starving the entire herd which will result in the old and the sick being among the first to die anyway. This completely defies logic.