Support for HAMAS? Show your work. Below is the op-ed that led to her detention. Please point out the parts that are "openly hostile to our country."
Now compare that with support for a 3+ month long effort to overturn an election and illegally install someone as president, culminating in a violent attack on the capital in an effort to disrupt the lawful election. Followed, of course, by that same man pardoning all involved including those who assaulted police officers with weapons and explosives.
But that doesn't really matter, because your entire framework is based on indefinitely detaining persons based on a subjective interpretation of "hostile to America," which even someone as dumb as yourself should understand opens the door to the executive branch establishing their own "test" and, should a Dem occupy the white house in the future, would surely include those who tried to overthrow an election.
Just the other day, Mike Johnson suggested abolishing Federal Courts in order to get rid of that pesky judicial review that keeps hindering Trump's agenda. That darn Constitution getting in the way again. You would agree that if a Visa Holder shared that article or voiced support for such a position that is certainly more "hostile" to our country than whatever is in the above op-ed?
Oh, you disagree? Then perhaps you see the inherent problem in such a standard. But of course you won't. And you'll get banned. Again. And then come back with a new name and play the "woe is me. surly has gone to shit," card without a modicum of understanding that the years you have spent on a message board where you are despised by all other members, get asked to leave on a monthly basis, and personify the definition of an "internet troll," is about the most pathetic existence imaginable. Shit, I'm kinda embarrassed by the hold this place has on me, and I don't have everyone calling me a fucking donkey every 10 minutes.