Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    6470
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Foosters

  1. Just now, workswithseed said:

    Sure, that's better than.

     

    Let me put it in a way you can understand.

    If someone said "Donald Trump is a capitalist pig hell bent on destroying the working class." Is it fair to assume that person is a marxist/socialist? I'd say so. Is it possible your assumption could be wrong? Of course.

    So, similarly, when someone parrots an anti-Semitic talking point that has been recycled for years, I assume that person is an anti-Semite. Could I be wrong? Sure.

     

  2. 1 minute ago, workswithseed said:

    "Soros strategy and objective to destabilize the United States city by city"

    You posted this. Is there more where he dislikes all jews or something? I better not see you hating one person, cause that means you hate the whole ethnicity.

    Would your distaste dissolve if I simply said "the judge - whose motivations cannot be gleaned at this time - peddled a famously tired anti-Semitic trope?"

     

     

  3. 14 minutes ago, workswithseed said:

    It's funny that you claim antisemitism on no proof.

    Strange, why would you do that?

    I posted evidence that a judge made anti-semitic remarks. I surmised, based on that, that he/her is anti-semitic. You are . . . . what is it your doing? Defending an anonymous judge you know nothing about. Why? Where's your proof? Do you have conflicting evidence to give me?

    If someone said "The Rothschilds are secretly bankrolling the Marxists to destroy Western Civilization," do I need to run through the speaker's history of Jewish relationships before I conclude that person is anti-Semitic? 

    If someone says "The holocaust is a hoax" do I need to scan their entire social media history before I can call them anti-Semitic?

    But whatever. You exist, at least on this site anyway, to defend the alt-right, Trump, anti-Semitic comments (apparently), and whoever is currently at the vanguard of battling the BLM movement. That's the path you have chosen.  You aren't an outright troll so, kudos, I guess, but @hobbes2702 is right - your actions define you, and all I've seen is someone willing to go to the mattresses for trolls, the alt-right, and racists. 

  4. 8 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

    Is he anti-Semitic based on some other behavior?  Because first thing I think of when I hear Soros invoked is crazy Trumper.  Anti-Semitic is likely part of that package, but that's down the list a ways.

    Nonetheless, I think this is a good illustration of the Flynn problem:  no matter how much you don't like the government's decision to dismiss a case or a count or an enhancement, the judge can't have any say in that.

    I assume that when people attack wealthy jews for bankrolling marxists to destroy our way of life, that anti-Semitism plays a pretty large role, yes. 

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
  5. Nice remark from a sitting anti-Semitic judge here in LA:

    Quote

    “I don’t think voters appreciated the impact of his policies nor how they had also left San Francisco in a societal crisis. This lack of appreciation is one of the reasons that Soros has focused on local elections for mayors and district attorneys as those elections simply do not receive the close attention that higher offices do. While he claims that his policies are based on data, science, etc., I have not seen any disclosure of such information and think it is highly likely they are based on the Soros strategy and objective to destabilize the United States city by city. Those policies are also greatly at odds with his oath to uphold the law as a result of his one person flouting of years of policy decisions by the Legislature.”

    Unsurprisingly, judges have spent the last week refusing to dismiss enhancements even after the DAs have been moving to dismiss. God forbid we can't continue to lock people up at rates higher than anyone else in the world.

  6. 22 minutes ago, C-Man said:


     Herman was the hot, up-and-comer and we had to strike fast to keep him from going to LSU. We did what had to be done. Who else was feasible or likely then?

     

    Did some googling, as I can't recall the names we were seriously floating, and found a few articles with top candidates to replace Strong when it became apparent he was not going to work. Slim pickings:

    Quote

    Athlon Sports:

    -Tom Herman

    -Larry Fedora

    -Bryan Harsin

    -Mike Macintyre 

    -Phillip Montgomery (who?)

    Quote

    Fansided:

    1) Tom Herman

    2) Lane Kiffin

    3) Les Miles

    4) Bryan Harsin

    5) Lincoln Riley

    Quote

    Sporting News:

    1) Herman

    2) Les Miles

    3) Lane Kiffin

    4) Chip Kelly

    5) Gene Hizik (lol wut)

    6) Bryan Harsin

    7) PJ Fleck

    Quote

    DMN ( candidates NOT named Tom Herman who could replace Strong)

    1) Dabo

    2)Fedora

    3) Harsin

    4) Miles

    5) Jimbo Fisher

    6) Saban

    Quote

    Hookem.com:

    10) Pat Fitzgerald

    9) Jimbo

    8 Harsin

    7) Sonny Dykes

    6) Les Miles

    5) Mark Dantonio

    4) Tom Herman

    3) Rich Rodriguez

    2) Dan Mullen

    1) David Shaw

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
  7. 47 minutes ago, Hermanator said:

    Can you go teach this idiot how to create fiction that could actually be believable?

    I mean if you're going to go through the trouble of making shit up to sound like an insider at least put minimal effort in to know your subject matter and make the actions of the real people in it congruent with their known actions and personalities. I'd like to believe Urban is coming too but I can't force myself to believe garbage this sloppy. 

    You're being very un-dude

    • Hook 'Em 1
  8. 2 minutes ago, PassiveAggressiveCoach said:

    I gave you an answer you didn't like it. They both lie a lot. Trump has lied more in the last 4 yrs Biden has lied more in the last 47. They both have issues with the truth. Keep asking me and that's what you'll get. It's a sad question to be honest because 1 is our current president and 1 is becoming our president. 

    So does my 4 year old daughter. But she's not seeking to overthrow a valid election.

    Or, let me guess, you're a former Obama voter who thinks Trump really won the election?

  9. Quote

    Supporters of the president who have been gaslighted into believing that there has been a multi-state conspiracy to steal the election recognize that the court is not a liberal institution. If the court will tell the truth, the country will listen.

    Wrong.

    If the justices rule against Trump they cannot be, by definition, anything but liberal.

    • Like 1
    • Rage+1 1
×
×
  • Create New...