Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5529
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Foosters

  1. 5 minutes ago, BNB said:

    So you Dems have one or 2 people stating they presumed Trump wanted quid pro quo, nothing evident. 

    Trump had a phone call stating he wanted Ukraine corruption to stop after the new President was elected, and he wanted to know if they had any info on The Russia Investigation into him that was proved false. He had just seen on the news someone showing a video of Biden bragging about getting a Ukraine official fired, so he asked about that also.

    Behind the scenes he was withholding aid, but that was not uncommon.  

    Good luck with that.  This will cost you.

     

    hahahaha 

     

  2. 1 minute ago, Paul Wesley said:

    Watching a Bill Barr interview right now and wondering if there was already a "Fuck Bill Barr" thread.  

    What a profoundly immoral and disingenuous piece of shit.

    He's out there now repeating his refrain of "no evidence of collusion"... a statement that ignores the emails with Don Jr enthusiastically welcoming Russian interference, secret meetings in Trump Tower followed by countless lies about the existence and the substance of that meeting, the numerous felony convictions for Roger Stone participating in that dirty collaboration, the undenied and unrefuted fact that Trump's team was sharing private polling data with a pro-Putin Russian oligarch, etc. 

    I can't really argue when Republican apologists say "collusion is not a crime," but that's a different thing than saying "no evidence of collusion," which is beyond absurd.  

    I type this as Trump holds private meetings in the White House with former KGB agents.  

    He also said that the greatest danger to our free system was the last administration syping on the Trump campaign. 

  3. 2 minutes ago, RomaVicta said:

    They did not allow any witnessess that weren't vetted by Shit. [Any reason these exculpatory witnesses couldn't have found another avenue to right this terrible wrong? As you know, Trump is inhibiting and likely intimidating witnesses; does this strike you as innocent behavior?]

    They are being attacked and slandered by Dems who will twist and use the control over the media to spin whatever shit they want, why would the WH comply? [Who has the Reynolds Wrap on their cabeza now? Even if the Dems were as shameless as the Republicans in their treatment of witnesses, are you saying these mythological exculpatory witnesses are too snowflakey to stand up to it? Do they need dimmed lights and soft questions to illicit their delicate truths about the real President Trump? You're not stupid, but maybe your irony deaf.]

    Remember what 0bomba did...? [C'mon]

    The judicial branch is the ones between the congress and WH when there's a disagreement, there's 3 branches, let them do their job. [Yay! Of course, it will be difficult with Republicans violating their oaths.]

    Either way, the dems are broke, they don't have the money to campaign, they haven't done anything with the majority in congress, so their strategy is to attack Trump to try and get the twitter types all riled up. [Willful lying on your part. You know that Congress has passed over 400 bills, a large majority bi-partisan, that Mitch is sitting on in the senate perhaps to give life to your lie

    It's a horrible mistake, pandering to a twitter audience is not going to win elections. Most people just don't care or are somewhere in the center politically. They tend to be repelled by things, rather than be attracted to things. [Blah blah blah]

    Ya gonna lose. [If so, the entire country other than about 1% loses. That 1% never loses. It must be an honor serving them.]

    Negged for disingenuity and dishonesty. Betraying your country (if this is your country) deserves worse than a neg which I wish for you and your kind. You make yourself my enemy.

    Whoa....one at at time. Zavala can only ignore one question at a time.

  4. 15 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:

    Seriously, you have no idea what the legal definition of whistle blower is. It has nothing to do with being a witness, but just being a person who would inform on the illicit activity of an individual or organization. I represent civil whistle blowers for things like Medicare fraud. Sometimes they have first hand information. Sometimes they just have information they have pieced together from others and realize that something bad is happening. They report it and then it gets investigated. 

    I love watching Zavala, the 20-something suburban kid, educated on Youtube and USPatriotz.net, explaining to everyone how this is supposed to work.

  5. 3 minutes ago, Fozzz said:

     

    Obviously the discrediting of our intelligence and law enforcement agencies.  How is this even a question?

    How is it a question why you would favor Russia State intelligence agencies over our own?

     

    Hurr durr, I don't trust the deep state intelligence, here, look what the Russian intelligence says. I am very smart

    • Like 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, hornhorn said:

    He lives with a frog of the well syndrome. He should also read up on how South Asians(Indians mostly) were taken to South Africa and Kenya as rail road workers and slaves. But none of them have the same violent history. 

    Ahh yes, the african-american experience: the same as white folks since 1865.

  7. 4 hours ago, HenryJames said:

     

    Article does a poor job explaining things. There are two separate issues here. The first, is whether he is mentally competent to stand trial. If he is found not competent, the case doesn't go away. He gets sent off to a lock-down psychiatric hospital where they wait for him to regain competency. If he doesn't, then he just stays there. The second issue is a competent defendant asserting that he was incapable of forming the requisite intent due to a mistaken belief due to mental illness. Doesn't sound like that's what they are arguing here. He fully intended to kill the victim. He just killed him for reasons that don't exist.

  8. 1 hour ago, elfenix said:

    he says that people need to be accurate with their facts when reporting rather than alarmist.  he says we can engineer our way around this like we do other natrual disasters.  to illustrate engineering, he claims deaths from natural disaster are down from their 1931 peak of "3.7 million " by 99.7%.  what happened in 1931?

    that seems like a pretty big range and him choosing the highest end of it kinda undercuts his point.  he's also making the statistical error of comparing 2 points on what is probably a fucking noisy chart.  sure, last year was 11,000, but one tsunami in indonesia and we're back to 20x that. 

    Kinda undercuts his point?

    Its like saying everyone should stop bitching about the Boeing planes nosediving into the ground because airline deaths are way down from their high of 2800+ in 2001.

    • Like 2
  9. 5 hours ago, Incredulity said:

    Factually the New Black Panther Party says hello.

    Hey, if you're suggesting that the alt-right receive the same treatment that the Black Panthers did, you'll hear no argument from me. Bit surprised that you have taken that position, tbh.

  10. 23 minutes ago, Fozzz said:

    Ugh, the burden runs the other way bro.  I don't find Sondland's "guess" (as Sondland himself put it) to be all that powerful of evidence of Trump's intent.  

    Dude, please come be on one of my juries. In my almost decade of criminal defense, I have never once encountered anyone in a jury pool who thinks that specific intent must be proven by the accused articulating that intent. It's also not what the law, in any jurisdiction, says. 

    "Yes, my client broke into the house. Yes he was wearing gloves and a mask. Yes he had a large black bag and burglary tools. But ladies and gentlemen, as you know, the people must show that my client had the specific intent to commit a crime after entering and you have heard no evidence that my client ever told anyone he was breaking into this house with any specific intent to do anything."

    • Like 7
    • Haha 1
  11. 10 hours ago, Goo Punch said:

    Yeah but those traits within Kenny came from his childhood, not his time at Texas.

    Are there a lot of soft high school players that come into college and have those traits instilled?  

    • Hook 'Em 1
×
×
  • Create New...