Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5669
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Foosters

  1. 5 minutes ago, Blotto said:

    Someone should start a PAC called Cucks for Cruz and then buy commercial time with the ad consisting of nothing but someone reading Cruz's quotes from the 2016 campaign about what a pyscopath Trump is, all the while displaying the phonebank photo. End it with texas tough. Never mention Beto, never criticize Cruz. Just his words.

     

    This ad paid for by Cucks for Cruz.

    ok how do i do it

  2. 1 minute ago, slorch said:

    Beto wrote those pieces? Weird.  When I click on them it has other peoples names.

    • Like 4
  3. Just now, Chrispy said:

    If illegal aliens are not seeking asylum or a refugee, pursuance of expedited removal is reasonable under the 1996 law. They don’t need to fall under the purview of the DOJ to perform that task in my estimation. 

    cart before the horse, brother.

  4. 1 minute ago, The People’s Elbow said:

    Nah. I see him reverting back to what he’s done his entire career: hocking his faux-luxury last name to the low IQ and poors, and they’ll trip over themselves giving him money they can’t afford to give away. 

    This steak is gold! This hotel has gold plungers! This university has a gold professor!

  5. 7 minutes ago, Chrispy said:

    Only a third of the I.C.E budget goes to immigration enforcement, much of what they do is investigative work regarding child exploitation, military arms proliferation, human trafficking, etc. You’ll likely see the rallying cry to abolish I.C.E continue to wane, as most realize it’s a foolish endeavor. 

    So before I.C.E. there was no agency tasked to enforce those things?

  6. 14 minutes ago, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:

    And that’s how you MAGA, folks.

    Just wait. By the end of the day we will have photo-shopped social media posts to make it appear that he is Antifa. I'd bet some are even posted here. Guarantee it.

  7. 14 minutes ago, Captainant said:

    This is some bright line gestapo tactics shit. This is fucking insane. Can't wait to hear from my inlaws this weekend about how this is perfectly normal.

    They'll tell you its normal because Sean Hannity is going to tell them that the Obama administration did the same thing.

    • Like 2
  8. 39 minutes ago, kopp0e said:

    not fake news, but I don't know how this isn't a "fake news" type story... Who thinks this will have a good outcome..?

     

    Lots of people. Myself included. Have you read any of the arguments for the bill? If so, which ones do you disagree with? 

    • Like 1
  9. 46 minutes ago, SpiralOut said:

    Good thing I put "supposedly" in there.

     

    Yeah good thing. Just like how Rush on his show said "It appears that the shooter was an active part of the Trump resistance." No harm. No accusations. Just asking questions.

     

    Here's a tip for next time: In case you haven't noticed, every time there is a shooter, 4chan and Reddit go to work photo-shopping posts and images to make it look like the perpetrator is antifa or a lefty. Every single time.  

    • Like 2
  10. 2 minutes ago, American Swindle said:

    I agree with most of this, but if you are on the right side of the argument, then trying to persuade the other side by berating them with what seems like condescending vitriol is not the way to go about it in my opinion.  

    So what I see is this:

    Person Touching the stove: "Ooh Hot!"  

    Person A's Response: "you dumb ass mawfucker, didn't you know it was hot?  Maybe you're dumbass will think next time!" Inner Monologue: (That'll teach that dumbfuck) 

    Person B's Response: "it'll burn you, and it should be avoided in the future"

     

    Now which response do you think will get the person touching the hot stove to actually not touch the stove next go round?  IMO, there are many out there that would touch it again to spite Person A. 

     

    Treating them like children actually does make a lot of sense. Thanks for the tip.

  11. 5 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

    Hold up... are you trying to insinuate that this type of shit doesn't happen on the right?  There's a whole fucking network dedicated to passing along misinformation.

    He's not trying to insinuate anything. He's flat out stating that this only occurs with the liberal media.  He's either a liar, insane, or both and should be mocked.

    • Like 2
  12. 30 minutes ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

    I was quoting that article on his opponent saying he wants a permanent moratorium on offshore drilling.  I just can't imagine he knows anything about what he is saying.  You run a platform like that in Houston, you are liable to get shot.

    You nailed it as to why Duncan is in office today.  

    lol what

    It's almost like different parts of the country have different views on things.

  13. We've got some good news and bad news. The good news is, we've managed to work out a plea deal with the prosecutors! The bad news is, its literally the worst deal in history.

    • Haha 1
  14. Just now, lemonlime said:

    What does that mean?  They came to a consensus on 17 of the 18 counts, but are deadlocked on 1?  Or they can't come to a consensus on any count? 

    I think the former

×
×
  • Create New...