Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    6292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foosters

  1. Bummer that so many of our DT posters are close to retirement age. Pushing back retirement to own the libs!
  2. Trump gets on Truth Social: "wont someone rid me of this meddlesome POTUS!" problem solved
  3. Trump running as VP opens the door for a Shapiro-Obama ticket. Good luck.
  4. wow the wool pimps already come with canes
  5. This actually does appear to be a thing.
  6. I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that 12 months ago, Sayta and 6th St. were bemoaning the state of the TE room after JT's departure.
  7. You can now add, "as head of overseeing all Federal Funding, Soros then slashed congressionally approved funding, targeting areas of the country that did not support Biden."
  8. Support for HAMAS? Show your work. Below is the op-ed that led to her detention. Please point out the parts that are "openly hostile to our country." Now compare that with support for a 3+ month long effort to overturn an election and illegally install someone as president, culminating in a violent attack on the capital in an effort to disrupt the lawful election. Followed, of course, by that same man pardoning all involved including those who assaulted police officers with weapons and explosives. But that doesn't really matter, because your entire framework is based on indefinitely detaining persons based on a subjective interpretation of "hostile to America," which even someone as dumb as yourself should understand opens the door to the executive branch establishing their own "test" and, should a Dem occupy the white house in the future, would surely include those who tried to overthrow an election. Just the other day, Mike Johnson suggested abolishing Federal Courts in order to get rid of that pesky judicial review that keeps hindering Trump's agenda. That darn Constitution getting in the way again. You would agree that if a Visa Holder shared that article or voiced support for such a position that is certainly more "hostile" to our country than whatever is in the above op-ed? Oh, you disagree? Then perhaps you see the inherent problem in such a standard. But of course you won't. And you'll get banned. Again. And then come back with a new name and play the "woe is me. surly has gone to shit," card without a modicum of understanding that the years you have spent on a message board where you are despised by all other members, get asked to leave on a monthly basis, and personify the definition of an "internet troll," is about the most pathetic existence imaginable. Shit, I'm kinda embarrassed by the hold this place has on me, and I don't have everyone calling me a fucking donkey every 10 minutes.
  9. So if Dems take back the White House you'd be fine with them forcibly grabbing and indefinitely detaining Visa holders who have publicly supported the MAGA agenda? Or is it a one way street in your mind?
  10. fify2.0
  11. Took me about 3 minutes to look up. Unless Fatty is saying that Sanders is lying on his disclosure forms?
  12. what?! are you saying those right-wing trolls aren't on the level?
  13. That the current US administration has a policy goal of not letting that specific stock tumble, and will bend policy to ensure that it happens.
  14. I assume the CEOs of Ford and GM also personally donated hundreds of millions to Biden's election campaign, were rewarded with being appointed the head of a brand new federal agency, and then got invited to the Pentagon to discuss top secret planning? Oh, while spending most free time publicly attacking critics of the president? If we're going to be honest with our "both sides!" takes
  15. So like, all the residents of Highland Park?
  16. The below is a passage from a George Saunder's short story entitled "Love Letter." I've thought of it often these last few months:
  17. Hmm, posting a list of awards based on subjective criteria in rebuttal to a comment that someone was overrated isn't the winning hand that you think it is.
×
×
  • Create New...