Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foosters

  1. As a defense attorney, should my obligation be to the truth? If I come into possession of material that tends to show guilt, should I have a duty to disclose that to the court and the prosecuting attorney? If I urge the jury to vote "not guilty" should I be jailed for perjury? Obviously I'm a bad person for choosing a job that requires something other than the zealous pursuit of the truth, but I'd like to know how the non-lawyers think the criminal justice system should work.
  2. I think the winning has gone to our heads. Probably need another decade of program malaise to recalibrate expectations.
  3. Foosters

    Measles

    Was hoping Pimphand would make an appearance on this thread. Subscribed
  4. Yeah, he's the resident nut of the board. He's done tons of research on google and YouTube so don't mess with him
  5. SI will always hold a special place in my heart. I lived overseas for 4 years as a kid, and my weekly SI and SI for Kids subscriptions were my only lifeline to the American sports world. Hell, we didn't even get CNN international until my last year there. They'd always arrive about 3 weeks late, but I'd read every article - even on sports I was not interested in. I'd cut photos out and tape them to my wall, and by the time I was in high school, most of my walls and even the ceiling of my bedroom were plastered in SI covers and photos. One of my proudest moments during childhood was drawing a picture of Troy Aikman in colored pencils and having it published in SI for Kids. Felt like a fucking superstar.
  6. A state with 40 million people A 15 page thread spanning 2.5 years One establishment closes to crime Checkmate, Libs
  7. To be fair, as long as immigrants have been pouring into this country, there has been opposition - sometimes violent - to immigration. From the Alien-Sedition acts of the late 18th century, to the rise of the Know-Nothing party in the middle of the 19th. The climate has always been tense when it comes to immigration, and the hatred of others remains as strong today as it was 250 years ago. The only difference being that we convinced ourselves somewhere between 1970-1990 that we had risen above naked xenophobia as pillar of foreign policy, and that the words of Emma Lazarus accurately reflected our history of immigration. Her words, it turns out, were aspirational only. Conditioned to believe that the US is the welcoming land of opportunity, imagine our surprise when it turns out Susan from the PTA is fine with soldiers shooting children as they cross the border.
  8. GTFO. He's getting rightly raked because he took the coward's way out by pushing a position, and then claiming he was "too busy" to respond to the gaping holes in his argument, but conveniently not too busy to respond with insults in kind. Fucking bizarre to white knight that behaviour on this message board of all places.
  9. you look at a deposition and its just all about questions and answers and answers and questions and we've got to do a better job with that
  10. Can you tag your posts with like a "*busy" so we know which posts you are able to respond to, and which ones you will be too busy to handle? Or maybe you're on a break now? But you weren't a few minutes ago when you couldn't respond?
  11. Good luck hoping the rurals will see this for what it is. Wall St spent 20 years moving every blue collar job overseas, dismantling unions, and slashing regulations. Then the Wall St. fat cats took to the podium and blamed it all on Democratic Globalists and told the working class that they're the only people looking out for them. And they bought it.
  12. Wrong. I have clients go on rants at the judge all the time. Sometimes directly calling a judge "mothefucker" or worse. Judges patiently wait for the outburst to end, and move on. Why do you continue to argue with such certainty over issues you are unfamiliar with?
  13. https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=_PLUS_cASZsP0hNiBQOHYbw_PLUS_TPQ==&system=prod The email exchange between Trump's attorneys and the Judge regarding his decision to testify. Just when you think the simulation is all out of ideas, they come up with this!
×
×
  • Create New...