Jump to content

Foosters

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    6297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Foosters

  1. Thanks. I was under the impression that police had arrested him and had suggested that he be charged. Had no idea the DA had already drawn up the indictment and filed charges. I agree but you don't have to explain that to me. I've represented hundreds of people who faced felony charges solely bc they didn't listen to a cop's instructions and shit like this happens.
  2. What charges have been filed?
  3. Kobe helicoptered to work and look how that turned out smart guys
  4. Couple of years ago I saw that Clark Hunt delivered the commencement speech at SMU. Was puzzled at first, because I couldn't understand what advice a guy born into a billionaire family and who inherited all of his success could give to 22 year old college grads, but then I remembered it was SMU.
  5. Understandable
  6. Fair. Given your "we are at war, take no prisoners" attitude, wouldn't this be something you should publicize as it could hurt him politically? Your passionate calls to arms lose a bit of their punch if you're unwilling to risk upsetting this relationship with someone who is actively fighting against everything you stand for. Just my .02
  7. Yikes on the analogy. People all over the country were hanging flags upside down to protest the stolen election. Yes, its dumb. But it also was happening.
  8. That's the best story they came up with? Should have just gone with "my wife is a simple homemaker and was confused when putting up the flag. I've since spoken to her and I can assure you it will not happen again."
  9. Huh? You have private text messages from Mackowiak? By share, I assume you mean with the media?
  10. Pretty sure that was a fake commercial made by Texas
  11. well, he never specified it happened after 2000
  12. Surprised he passed the NFL physicals without a spine
  13. lol was that poll first conducted in the middle of a war/civil insurgency?
  14. what if you gave them all skates and played it on ice?
  15. careful boys! we're pushing him even further to the right!
  16. The law surrounding first amendment protections for gov't employees is. Which is what you have been arguing against all day.
  17. No, that's cancel culture and woke ideology speaking my friend.
  18. Here's Amy Wax. Professor at a private university. Still employed.
  19. The conversation everyone else was having involved the first amendment's applicability when it comes to public employees, and how the analysis is different in regard to public vs. private employers. Why you repeatedly responded with certainty to posts NOT discussing whether Heynan will prevail is curious. Let me give you an example to help you understand: "Well, the patient has been shot through the abdomen, and the procedure is complicated and risky. The chances of survival will depend largely on what we find during surgery." "LOL doc, that's completely retarded and you're wrong. I'll bet you he survives." "Ok?"
  20. On what? That's its not a complicated issue with nuances in case law? Or is your position that if this employee does not prevail in a lawsuit, that proves that the law is straightforward? How many weird hills a week do you die on?
×
×
  • Create New...