
sheeeit
-
Posts
763 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by sheeeit
-
-
21 hours ago, JimmyJames said:
Fuck you and your bullshit excuses for this asshole.
Its much more important to you to prove it wasn’t racially motivated than proving the guy was a murderer. That’s fucked in the head.
You are a large part of the problem because guys like you and the sack fail to recognize the truth and are just plain intellectual idiots and racists who refuse to recognize what you are.
You will never admit that and I don’t give a shit. You are.
Too funny. You are so unhinged you do not even realize that this response is exactly what I am talking about. Lots to unpack here.
"Fuck you and your bullshit excuses for this asshole."- What excuse did I make? Do you even know what an excuse is? I'll give you a hint, trying to understand why someone does something like this is not an excuse. Understanding the guy had some fucked up religious and sexual ideas does not excuse anything he did you dolt.
"Its much more important to you to prove it wasn’t racially motivated than proving the guy was a murderer. That’s fucked in the head. "- Well considering that I referred to him as a murderer and killer multiple times and that he was arrested and confessed to the murders I sort of assumed we had already "proved" he was a murderer. Maybe you needed some additional proof? Not sure. As for the racial motivation, I am fully aware that you and your ilk do not care at all about actual truth or facts, but most people do. We were fed a constant response from politicians and media outlets and activists that were falling all over themselves to be the first to call this racially motivated. We then had multiple posters on here claim the same thing. I, and a few others, merely pointed out that the actual facts as we currently know them do not point to this being a racially motivated crime.
"You are a large part of the problem because guys like you and the sack fail to recognize the truth and are just plain intellectual idiots and racists who refuse to recognize what you are."- Huh? What truth am I not realizing? The reality is that you and your ilk once again, are not even remotely as smart as you think you are. It differs for everyone but you just seem like a massive jealous idiot that that gets his jollies off by coming to an anonymous message board and ripping on people you think you understand by assigning opinions to them that they don't have. I guess you do it to make yourself feel better or something. You remind me of the 5 year old that doesn't want your best friend to have any other friends so you rip on all of them to somehow try and make yourself look cooler when the reality is that you are just insecure, jealous and pathetic.
-
6
-
-
4 hours ago, JimmyJames said:
Yes that is exactly why he would lie about and why he in fact did lie about it.
Or maybe he went to an Asian massage joint to try to kill whitey, figuring they would be the customers and the Asians were the collateral damage.
Dude was obviously targeting Asians. It’s a mystery to me why anyone would try to deny that but I guess the outrage machine needs its fuel.
I’ll just reply to this post but it is targeted toward all of the other usual suspects that have the same rhetoric.
Posts like these are the reason why the vast majority of educated people think that you are idiots. You jump to conclusions based on little or no facts and then, simultaneously, scold other people for jumping to conclusions opposite of yours with little or no facts. You are so blinded by your preconceived notions and ideologies that you literally have become the people that you chastise.
The murderer in question spent many months in 2019/2020 in a sex addiction rehab facility. We can debate the whys and why not in another thread but it is an absolute fact that the overwhelming majority of massage parlors that offer sexual favors are employed by Asians. This in no way blames the massage parlor employees. It is simply a fact that if you are a sex addict and you need an easy fix then an Asian massage parlor is a fairly inexpensive and relatively safe way to get that fix. The murderer admitted that he visited these places multiple times and received sexual favors before he committed the murders. There is absolutely nothing in his past, his statements to police, the statements of his former roommate or anyone else that suggest that he was targeting agents. If the vast majority of massage parlors that offered sexual favors were employed by some other race, then that race would have been the ones that he killed because those would have been the people that he received sexual favors from. The dude was obviously mentally unstable.
-
8
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, Pam Cummings said:
Most people in this thread are dipshits. You have one group taking this stuff and saying "omg this obviously means we have massive amounts of anti-asian sentiment and hate in this country. Asians are being murdered by the truckload!" No, dipshits, they aren't.
Then you have another group saying "well how do we KNOW this guy was targeting Asians? It could just be a sex worker thing!" No, dipshits, it isn't. This guy had a history of saying negative things about Asians and only killed Asian people. Do the fucking math.
I'm so fucking tired of these stories getting covered in a way that just makes everyone extrapolate the details of whatever happened to fit their worldview. Some things are just bullshit topics to begin with.
I know this makes me a bad person but these are my favorite types of posts on this website.
When a self righteous and obviously self unaware poster scolds other posters for playing fast and loose with the facts and then plays fast and loose with the facts. Unintentional irony is always the funniest irony.
-
1
-
-
On 3/14/2021 at 6:02 PM, Sawbonz said:
Honest it’s probably the latter. More likely than not you would have figured things out in the end had you stayed in public school. I have nothing against private schools I just don’t see it as judicious use of my money. Unless the Ivies are important to you, or certain fraternities or sororities at certain other schools, it just doesn’t matter if you have a high aptitude kid
I haven’t read the last few pages so maybe this has been addressed, but I agree with you and disagree with you on this point. I will agree that a very high percentage of“High aptitude“ kids are going to do well academically wherever they go to school. I also think that someone can make a good argument that the sociological aspect of most public schools (usually a much more diverse group of students from a racial, economic and customs perspective) can be a benefit to kids.
but there are also very legitimate reasons to send kids to private schools. as mentioned above, it really depends on the particular school. Of course you are going to have wealthy parents whose kids are dumb and entitled go to private schools. That’s just reality. but private schools alsoOffer a host of positive benefits including:
1) Religion- whether you happen to be religious or not, there are many, many people that are and do enjoy the fact that many religious-based schools teach religion and their sense of morality. You may think the reviews are ridiculous but those are their views and that is a big factor when they decide on schools.
2) Extracurricular activities- This is actually a huge one for many parents. If you live in an area with a large public school then your options to play football, basketball, drama, debate or just about any extracurricular programs are severely limited. You are now competing against a huge number of people for a relative few open spots.
3) Expectations- I agree with everyone that parental involvement is a huge factor. But, the expectations of the institutions also play a huge role. The Baltimore school clearly did not have any expectations that even a large percentage of their students would graduate and go to college. as always, human nature is always going to be what it is and kids will be kids. I don’t think it is arguable that a kid is more likely to fall between the cracks in a large public school versus a small private school.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Tuco said:
I'd say that's a distinction with little difference. Pope Francis, for all his intelligence, earnest study, and fine moral character, does not understand anything beyond the outline and stereotypes of a mature, sexual relationship. None of them do. Not a single fucking one of them. Yet, they set the rules on contraception, divorce, and gay marriage. And people actually listen to them.
I was raised Catholic. I credit a scholarship to a Catholic high school to give me the stability to get into a good college. I've known a lot of priests, and even corresponded with one for a few years. Like any other profession, some are really good people and some are assholes. But I would never listen to any of them when it comes to real life relationships. You might as well take fashion advice from a blind man.
Have to disagree with this specific point. I agree the Catholic Church has made gross errors over the years. I understand why they handled the sexual abuse scandal the way that they did but it still did not make it right. They should have been completely transparent in their investigations and should have admitted the issues publicly and routed out the bad offenders.
but, what you are asserting is that learned, intelligent individuals like the pope shouldn’t be able to dictate church positions on sexual issues because they take vows of celibacy. I completely disagree. There are literally thousands of scientific sociological studies that address virtually every issue that the church deals with in these matters. In addition, they have an almost unlimited supply of anecdotal evidence to pull from in their literally millions of conversations with men and women and married couples and members of LGBT community.
I used to actually have pretty much the same opinion that you have. Especially when it comes to marriage. How would a priest know what it takes for a successful, happy marriage when they’ve never experienced it. But the reality is, that they are actually more qualified than almost any other subset of people. The reason is that over thousands of years they have discussed marriage and marriage issues with literally millions of married couples. Certainly there are many common traits that are necessary for a successful marriage and Priess have heard all of the good and all of the bad.
Mike Leach never played football and yet is considered one of the best offensive minds in football maybe ever.
-
1
-
1
-
-
5 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
And I will have my Horns Up and sing it at the end of every game, just like I always do.
The irony of this post is off the charts. DD's claims:
1) It is an absolute fact that the song has racist origins
2) It doesn't matter if the song is actually racist or not if our black athletes think it is then we should respect their feelings and no one should get to tell them what they should be offended about
"If you say so, but it's clear that the EOT is no longer a unifying tradition at the University of Texas."
So after 100s of pages of telling people that the song is racist, that even if it is not racist it doesn't matter if it is or not if black people, especially black athletes, think that it is racist then we should do away with it. You fully admit to having always sung the song after games and will continue to do so. So you admit that continued to sing a song that you admit was considered offensive and racist by the players. You continued to sing a song and will continue to sing it even though you claim it is "no longer a unifying tradition at the University of Texas." Who is the fucking racist here. As usual, you and your ilk have zero true principles and zero character.
-
4
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Just one quick comment on minstrel shows. People have to understand that there is no common type of "minstrel" show. The ones in Texas at the time were much more akin to variety shows than anything related to racism. Most had no performers in black face at all.
Per the info found when this shit came up previously, the author of the song wanted to make a school song and poke fun at the current UT Pres. The song was NOT created to be performed at a minstrel show. It was not created by people associated with putting on the minstrel show. It had exactly nothing to do with the show. The truth is that in those times there was literally almost no way for the song creators to perform it for an audience that included the school president except at the minstrel shows. The only reason it was performed there was because the creators knew that the school president would be in attendance. Thats it. The Lee association stuff is stupidly ignorant. The minstrel show connection has been taken wildly out of context. There just isnt anything there.
The reality is that a professor stirred up racial animosity during an emotional time on campus and convinced some 18-22 year olds that something was racist and none of the 18-22 year olds spent any time researching the facts for themselves. I dont blame the 18-22 year olds. And I dont blame the professor. Just pointing out what happened. My guess is that all of this will be pointed out in the report.
I completely disagree with those that are saying that because something offends a particular group that other people have no right to question them. Of course they have the right to do that and they should do that. I am not talking about criticising them or belittling them or anything similar. I am saying that the offended group needs to have all of the relevant facts before making snap judgments. Allowing traditions and other things to be cancelled based on extremely weak or made up or taken out of context information, is always bad. I especially think those that maintain that they personally do not think the song is racist but think it needs to go because some of the players think it is are lacking in character. If you believe in something and you have researched all of the relevant facts about it and still feel that way then you should never back down. Because you may not care about the song or other types of traditions but one day this same thing will happen to something that you do care about.
-
37
-
1
-
CSB time that shows how things can change pretty quickly.
I was able to be in the living room when Mack was recruiting a highly rated black athlete in 2004 (single mother with no father present). At one point during the pitch Mack asked the player/mother if they knew anything about the "Eyes of Texas Tradition". They didn't say much. Mack spent the next 15 minutes talking about the song and its meaning within the Texas community. Really hyped up the family atmosphere of not just the team but the whole Texas experience. He then turned directly to the mother and said essentially "and we sing that song and raise our hands whether we win or lose. We are not going to win every game and is important to have character and part of character is doing things even when you dont feel like. But we build men with character at Texas". The mom was sold and the player eventually signed with Texas.
Just amazing to me that something that now is being used as a negative to UT and a perceived slight to Black players was used as a closing recruiting tool to Black players just a few years ago.
-
2
-
-
35 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:
Ok, now you are claiming the Sidney Powell defense. Yes, Sidney Powell said pretty much the same thing above, and was Flynn’s lawyer after he fired the other lawyers he lied to. Really, Sidney Powell? Incompetence is no defense. Flynn knew what he was doing. So do you. Liar.
To clarify, the filing under the LDA was due to Flynn et al lying about what they were actually doing, and who they were doing it for. And Sidney Powell became his lawyer. Release the Kraken!
Man you are strange. I’m not claiming any defense.
The FBI and the associated Mueller investigation tried to use FARA as leverage against Flynn. All Powell pointed out is that Flynn complied with the law as written by registering with Congress via the LDA. Powell, rightfully, pointed out that if Flynn violated FARA then every single entity that registered with Congress via the LDA also violated FARA. It was a bullshit claim by the FBI.
The point that continually sails above your head is that you and others keep trying to imply that Flynn got caught somehow or that he was trying to hide his activities somehow. It is absurd to suggest that he was trying to hide his activities when he specifically reported those activities to Congress. Under the LDA, Congress can, at any time, refer any particular foreign activity of a registrant to the DOJ for further scrutiny. Flynn followed the law as written. Now you may not like that law and I may not like that law but that doesn’t change the fact that it was the law.
FARA was written back in the 1930s and the LDA basically modernized the law. as mentioned earlier, Biden’s current pics for secretary of state, secretary of defense and Director of national intelligence formed a lobbying/consulting company that cater to foreign businesses and foreign governments. They registered the entity with Congress via the LDA. Their firm is doing the exact same thing that Flynns firm was doing which is using their government contacts as leverage to atttact business.
it will be quite telling if/when those individuals are forced to retroactively register as foreign agents if you will have the same opinion of them as you have of Flynn.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, immamac said:
This is bullshit trolling. You aren't being intellectually honest about the comparison here or you are just plain stupid. Neither is acceptable for continuing the discussion.
If you think that the elected president of the United States cant talk about rainbows butterflies and what ifs with the president of a neighboring country post election to give both countries population a vote of confidence regarding alignment, then you are fucking stupid.
Flynn went beyond well wishes and talking about hypotheticals. He straight asked them to do shit. Just shut the fuck up with your nonsense.
It is not bullshit trolling and you are misrepresenting my stance and taking the argument out of context.
As I have said multiple times now, I have absolutely no problem with Biden talking with the president of Mexico about whatever he wants to talk about. The issue is with other people that claimed that anyone speaking to a foreign government before they were sworn in was undermining US policy. You keep saying things like butterflies and rainbows as if the conversation was completely generic and devoid of policy implications. That is just false. JuSt as one example, there is the issue of the current treatment of asylum seekers. The current administration, rightly or wrongly, has made a stipulation that those waiting for asylum must do it in Mexico. That is the official position Of the current US government. Biden flat out told the president of Mexico that he was going to change that policy. You obviously do not seem to think that that is a big deal. I also do not happen to think it is that big of a deal. But it is, in fact, discussing changing current US policy with a foreign government. Using your own words, that is beyond well wishing and hypotheticals. That is straight up telling another country’s leader that you are going to change the current US policy towards that nation to a position that is more favorable to that country’s president. And again, I see absolutely nothing wrong with Biden doing that.
Flynn did not tell the Russians that the Trump administration was going to change anything. He asked them to temper their response to the Obama administration‘s latest round of sanctions and embassy personnel closings. Unlike the above I do not see any issue with Flynn or anyone asking a foreign government to temper their retaliation against the United States. You seem to think that Flynn asking them to temper their retaliation was somehow nefarious.
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, Judge Roybeanbag said:
Lying again. Flynn did not register as a foreign agent until March of 2017. You really are a dumb liar. Are you part of the outgoing administration? He registered AFTER he got caught.
Sigh. Flynn’s lawyers asked the govt where Flynn should register for his consulting work. The govt told them Flynn should register with Congress under the Lobbying Disclosure Act and not under FARA. So that is where they initially filed. Later, the govt said he should file under FARA. So he did. He never failed to file his activities with the government. This wouldn’t be the cloakroom if people didn’t accuse me of lying by lying themselves.
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Neonmoon said:
Answer me these questions.
Is Biden registered as a foreign agent?
Did Mexico interfere in the recent 2020 election?
Is Mexico under US sanctions?
1) no idea but I doubt it
2) I don’t think so
3) I don’t think so
Now answer mine.
1) What relevance or difference does it make that Flynn was a registered foreign agent, just like Biden’s incoming national security advisor is, when he was talking with Kisylak.
This “foreign agent” stuff is hilarious. Biden has at least 2 members of his team that are registered foreign agents. His national security advisor and his senior advisor ( hired to run the campaign for a Ukrainian prime minister).
Bidens freaking picks for sec of state, sec of defense and director of national intelligence all formed a consulting group in 2017 to leverage their government contacts with foreign governments and businesses on how to gain US government contracts. And I have absolutely no problem with that. But they did the exact same thing that Flynn did and yet somehow you mopes don’t care about that anymore.
2) Does the law that the idiots above were referencing that said that Flynn should be put in jail only apply to certain foreign governments or all of them?
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, washparkhorn said:
So is your issue the contrast between Biden 2020 and Flynn 2016 communications post-election?
Or are you pissed at the "cabal" and you seek to exact your revenge?
Hell of a hill to die on.
I feel like I have stated imy position pretty clearly a few times now. I am laughing at the people that said Flynn should be criminally charged for talking to foreign governments about new policy directions before his administration was sworn in and Biden doing the same thing.
I think that Biden has every right to talk to foreign leaders and I believe that he has every right to even talk about new policy stances that his incoming administration will have. I think every administration has done this and they should. I am laughing that when trumps national security advisor did the same thing it was suddenly a criminal act. I am laughing at the inconsistent mental twisting. I am laughing at the total and complete moronic behavior described above. These are great examples:
jimmyjazz - He (Flynn) was acting against US foreign policy. He should be in prison. That's the end of the story. I fucking dare you to put up a cogent argument to the contrary.
CaptainAnt- His (Flynn’s) goal was subversion of US policy of a sitting US president, literally acting against the national interest abroad.
Read those quotes. Not anything about Flynn being a foreign agent or negotiating or anything else. Those two idiotsthought Flynn should be put in jail for doing his actual job.
As I said, their stances were retarded then and they are retarded now. The only difference is that now that the shoe is on the other foot they can’t seem to remember their piousness
-
1
-
2
-
-
25 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
Because Erdogan is anti-American, both literally and figuratively: he's against everything we stand for. He has taken probably the most forward secular Islamic country and is turning back the clock by centuries. He's probably the worst dictator of a non-banana-republic there is.
Fair points. A bit hyperbolic but fair.
I suppose one could argue that anyone who lobbies on behalf of foreign dictators or cigarette companies or China or any number of bad actors are slimy. It would be a really big net of prominent people but I agree that Flynn was chasing the cash more than worrying about his conscious when they accepted the contract.
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, totallynotabuttpirate said:
Man you are some kind of stupid to even attempt to equate a foreign agent dipshit nobody like Flynn and the freaking President Elect of the United States
Making a run at Ttom's moron crown
You guys are just too stupid to even respond too sometimes. You don’t even know what you are talking about.
First, to claim that the national security advisor to the POTUS is simply a “ Foreign agent dip shit “ is kind of telling. Flynn was trumps national security advisor. Before joining the admin he started a firm that had foreign business dealings and, as a result, he registered as a foreign agent. Jake Sullivan is going to be Biden‘s national security advisor. After leaving Hillary‘s campaign Sullivan joined a company called Macro Advisory Partners. The firm has many ex government people in it and has contracts with multiple foreign governments. As a result, Macro/Sullivan are registered foreign agents in the exact same filing that Flynn was. Literally identical. I’m guessing you and the usual suspects did not know that. Biden‘s incoming national security advisor is a registered foreign agent in the identical sense that Flynn was a registered foreign agent as trumps national security advisor.
And go do a little search of the thread where all these lunatics up above made their quotes. All of them were saying that Flynn was actually talking to the Russian ambassador on behalf of Trump. That Trump, the freakingPresident elect of the United States as you referred to Biden,should really be the one who should be charged for interfering with the current administrations policies.
The combination of your ignorance and hypocrisy is stunning.
-
1
-
3
-
-
23 minutes ago, immamac said:
first of all, there is no indication of any "negotiating" of foreign policy with the president of Mexico. There was a conversation that happened between a current leader of Mexico and the incoming leader of the United States to understand where things sit right now and to give confidence that when the new administration starts they are negotiating in good faith on an established an aligned objective.
Flynn knew what he was doing was shady at best. Biden knew what he was doing didn't matter if it came out in public, because it's just 2 dudes talking about a world they would love to see come to be.
Flynn was talking about uh...reciprocation and active measured to be taken PRIOR TO the Trump administration being installed.
direct excerpt from the transcript.
Show me one example from a transcript that shows Biden behaving this way and I'll concede the point.
First of all, I do not care one bit if Biden changes our immigration policy. I thought trumps position on immigration was flawed and I think Biden‘s position on immigration is flawed. But both have the right to do what they think is best. To be clear, my original post (Confusing as it may be) was not, in anyway, meant to say anything about what Biden is doing or what Trump/Flynn did was either good or bad. I was just making fun of people for having stupid hypocritical positions.
That being said, I would like to debate your response a bit. First, when Biden and his team admit that in the call they talked about redeploying border assets and changing current US asylum laws and so forth, I do not see how you would say that is not negotiating foreign policy. It clearly is. Biden is openly telling a foreign country that the current approach with them under the current administration regarding immigration is going to change. again, I have no problem with that. It is how it should be. The new administration gets to call the new shots. It is actually much more of a negotiation and an undermining of the current policy though then what Flynn did.
Flynn did not say that any current policy between Russia and United States was going to change. I read your posted transcript 3 times and it is just not in there. Flynn is asking that Russia refrain from a knee jerk reaction to the existing administration that would put the incoming admin in a tough spot. I fail to see how that is even controversial. Certainly not shady. And Kisylak initiated the call, not Flynn. For you, or anyone, to insinuate that what Flynn was doing was undermining US policy, then you would have to say that the US policy at the time was a hope that Russia would retaliate strongly against the United States. That is too stupid to even consider.
I have no issue with you or even the new Biden administration. We will see what they do. But, you have to admit, that a few of the lunatics above like Denison and Jimmy Jazz, openly stated that Flynn should be charged with a crime for solely having a conversation with a foreign leader before the new administration was sworn in. And, based on that, they are being absolutely hypocritical when Biden is doing the exact same thing now. What they were saying was retarded then and is still retarded now.
-
3
-
-
5 minutes ago, Red Five said:
Yeah we're gonna get a lot of that over the next four years. "But character matters guys!".
I know reading is hard but I think you can probably get there. I am not at all talking about the character of the Biden administration. I am talking about the character of the idiots above who openly argued a position that they now say is just fine.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, immamac said:
Yeah that's not really how this works.
Sure it is. Explain to me how it is different? The idiots above said Flynn was a criminal because he was negotiating US foreign policy before the new administration was sworn in. That he was openly undermining the Obama administration. Now, Biden is negotiating US foreign policy before he has been sworn in. Buy that exact same definition, how is Biden not undermining the Trump administration‘s foreign policy? Do you not see the naked hypocrisy of the idiots above?
as I said, I had no problem with what Flynn did in his conversation with the Russian ambassador and I have absolutely no problem with what Biden is doing with his conversations with the Mexican president. I am merely laughing at the stupidity of the posters that I quoted above.
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, Red Five said:
Flynn was a foreign agent. Then he lied about it all repeatedly.
Biden is the President Elect of the United States.
I don’t think that means what you think it does.
-
3
-
-
23 minutes ago, Fudge Nuggets said:
He’s the fucking president-elect, not some run of the mill jackass off the street.
No shit. And Flynn was the incoming National Security Advisor. The idiots above are the ones who referred to Flynn as a private citizen because Trump wasn’t inaugurated yet. That’s the point. By their own idiotic words Biden is just a private citizen at this point who is undermining current IS policy.
-
4
-
-
Lmao. Maybe you guys should read the post again. Countless idiots on this board said Flynn was a criminal for interfering with US policy before Trump was inaugurated by having a phone call with the Russian ambassador and “discussing” US policy.
One of the biggest idiots was even presented a hypothetical where the incoming administration would do the same thing and if he would still feel the same way and he indignantly said that he would.i guess you either have principles and character or not.
it was no big deal when Flynn talked to the ambassador and it is no big deal that Biden is doing it. The naked hypocrisy is amusing to me
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
I never was fully convinced that Flynn was traitorous until recent events proved it. His work with Turkey is more reprehensible than what he was "tried" for, if not expressly criminal.
He is a liar and a loose cannon, though, and probably a greedy sumbitch, meaning greedy enough to compromise himself and his country for filthy lucre.
Just curious why you think his work with Turkey was "reprehensible"?
-
2
-
-
I forgot where I was. President elect Joe Biden has openly admitted to talking with foreign leaders about changing US foreign policy while still a private citizen. A few years ago, there were a lot of people that thought such an act was worthy of jail time.
Also, I have not yet started drinking which is a flaw on my part.
-
7
-
-
For no other reason than I found it funny. I am sure the usual suspects will be posting how Biden should go to jail and is a miserable traitor for discussing policy before inaugurated.
A few of my favorites:
jimmyjazz- He was acting against US foreign policy. He should be in prison. That's the end of the story. I fucking dare you to put up a cogent argument to the contrary.
Hugo- Flynn is a fucking traitor. That is all.
dennison-Why was MikeFlynn talking to the Russians?"
Hayduke- Flynn interfered with Obama’s foreign policy by negotiating with Russia and lied to Pence and the FBI about it. That was not legal.Lagunamadre- That would be a good defense. Guessing the prosecutors would probably point out that Flynn was a private citizen (not an "intelligence official") on December 29, 2016 when he spoke to the Russian ambassadors about sanctions. What would be your next defense after the courtroom got finished laughing at your first one?CaptainAnt- His goal was subversion of US policy of a sitting US president, literally acting against the national interest abroad.CaptainAnt- Suck my hairy ass and read and respond to the rest of my post while you celebrate the clearing of a person who actively conspired to subvert US foreign policyjimmyjazz- Flynn was working against US foreign policy. It doesn't surprise me a bit that Anastasis and others don't seem to see the problem with this. To me, it's dangerously close to treason, but hey, that's just me.Dennison- The FBI was well within its authority to want to look into what he and the Russians were talking about. Private citizens are prohibited from negotiating with foreign governments in disputes involving the United States.jimmyjazz- He was working against US foreign policy. Only in your retarded "I'm not a freak Libertarian" Libertarian pro-Trump world could you make the argument you just made and then also make any similar case had it been the inverse in terms of parties. Dude, own your fucking Trumpiness.jimmyjazz- No, it's because taking actions to contradict existing foreign policy with an enemy is in my view "treasonous". Are you really struggling with this? TRUMP HAD NOT BEEN INAUGURATED.jimmyjazz- The President correct? What if there’s an election at the end of his term and his successor ran explicitly on overturning many of his policy achievements and defeated someone that basically ran on maintaining the status quo? What if one of the most noteworthy policy differences he was proposing was a change in the tone and direction of the foreign policy?If he had waited a month you’d have been ok with it?
Are you fucking serious? Of course I would have been "OK" with it, disregarding political differences. Nobody gets a fucking head start you idiot.
jimmyjazz- Let's try this again: do you think it's cool for a private citizen to contradict foreign policy?
dennison- Well, it's against the law.
hayduke- It’s ok to not follow the law when it’s my team!!!! Trumpkin cant help but trumpkin!
-
1
-
11
-
Story without a Happy Ending
in Daily Texan
Posted
Maybe you can provide a link to these eyewitness's saying he said "kill all the asians". Because I checked cnn, msnbc, fox, politico, AP, the police, the AG and anything else I could think of and I can not find a single source to corroborate these claims. All I can find is one tweet from someone no one has ever heard of. Amazing that folks come here and claim somone has a preconceived notion or bias that is influencing their thoughths on this deal and then use a non confirmed tweet as a "fact". I am guessing that if the killer realy said that then all of the politicians and media calling this a hate crime would be all over it. Because, if he did say that, then it would absolutely be a racially motivated act and a hate crime. But somehow no one except you experts here are calling this a fact. Maybe the inept police force and investigators forgot to talk to eye witnesses? More likely they heard it and then locked the eye witness up in solitary so they can keep claiming this was not racially motivated.