Jump to content

hayden_horn

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    8879
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by hayden_horn

  1. 1 minute ago, Mojo Hand said:

    I would hope so, but all I saw was a reporter tweeting out that sources told him this.  While I doubt he was lying, I wonder if the informality and directness of Twitter lacks the layers of editing that normal publishing channels have. 

    yeah, i went to the nbc news website and that story is nowhere to be seen.

    while the appearance of impropriety doesn't mean impropriety shit went down, you still got to avoid the appearance of such.

  2. i really hope that the scotusblog dude's tweet is real, and nbc is all fake news on this. 

    but i think there is enough smoke here to be concerned. kennedy's recent decisions, his sudden retirement, his connections to this guy: it's all a bit dodgy. 

    and i actually kind of like the pick so far; what i've read is that he's a conservative dude, which is fine for a justice, imo. we want he court to be conservative, again, imo. but he doesn't look like a crazy conservative, and from what i've seen the rumors about this "not indicting a sitting president" doesn't mitigate the process of impeachment in doing so. as such, that's overblown. in fact, i think the democrats would be doing the country a disservice in trying to obstruct this pick. 

    all that said, the fucking SUPREME COURT should be as apolitical as possible, even given their inherent judicial biases. there is a reason they attend the state of the union, but do not stand nor applaud any of the show. the appearance of impartiality is the fucking cornerstone of the court. we put a fucking blindfold on justice, as much as we know most of the judicial system is corrupt and that blindfold is a sham. nevertheless, the highest court in the land should have the fucking propriety to do things correctly. if the story is true, even if kennedy thought he was doing the right thing for his country, it is still the wrong thing.

    • Like 1
  3. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5935093/BBC-air-report-Trump-called-President-Sex-Pest.html

    Quote

    The BBC is set to air interviews with two women who claim President Donald Trump behaved in a 'disgusting' way while at parties with young models in the 1980s and '90s.

    Panorama's report, titled 'Is the President a Sex Pest?', includes allegations that the real estate tycoon was 'like a predator in action' at events attended by models as young as 14.

    One of the women, Barbara Pilling, said she met Trump at a party in New York while she was a young model in the late 1980s. Trump was in his 40s.

    She alleged that he asked her how old she was and, when she told him she was 17, that he replied: 'Oh, great. So you're not too old and not too young. That's just great.'

    'I felt like I was in the presence of a shark getting ready to roll his eyes back in his head and bite me, you know, that's how I felt,' she explained.

    'It was just, like, get the hell out of here.' 

    Another woman, Heather Braden, told reporter Richard Bilton she saw Trump at a party in Miami in the 1990s when she was 23.

    She said there were only four men at the party, but 50 female models. She said she was one of the oldest women there.

    I felt like a piece of meat in a market,' she said. 

    A man who claimed to have attended several of the parties - but who insisted on remaining anonymous - told Panorama there were drugs at the events. 

    He said: 'There was a lot of cocaine around, there was a lot of alcohol.'

    Describing the men at the parties, he explained: 'These were guys who could easily be [the models'] fathers - two times over.'

    He added that it was 'kind of like a feeding frenzy'.  

    The anonymous man also said Trump was 'notorious' for his behaviour towards younger women. 

    'It was like a predator in action,' he said.

    'We do know that he was having sex with them, no question about it. The next day or days after we would hear about it, he would brag about it to his friends and it would get around that he scored. 

    'Maybe one or two girls at a time, which is what he loved to do.'

    Barbara also claimed the future president misbehaved with staff at the parties.

    She said: 'I remember one of the waitresses offered him a drink. He didn't take the drink and he slapped her bottom. 

    'She was a blonde. He gave her butt a slap and he was very loud. He was like, don't worry that's not your tip.' 

    She added: 'So I went to the washroom, and I was going in and a girl was coming out, and I go, 'Have you talked to that Trump guy, you know?' She goes, 'Yeah, as I was walking by he's like trying to grab my ass'.' 

    Panorama said the White House did not respond to the allegations.      

    but obama once attended a controversial church.

  4. 2 hours ago, Red Five said:

    The rewatchability of TLJ is pretty much zero. Even the prequels had parts that I wanted to see again, enough to sit through the rest of it. There isn’t one scene in TLJ that I feel like I ever need to watch again.

    I completely agree with this take. i suppose that episode 9 can do something to cast episode 8 in a better light, but i have zero desire to watch that film again.

    and here is the reason, and should be reason #1: there is not an obvious coherent storyline. i think they overreached in ep 7 with the star killer death star, but this movie doesn't build off the last one in any meaningful way. yes, it's dark, but so was empire. luke loses a hand, han's frozen, life sucks and then you fight on. 

    this movie departs from the ethos of the previous film, and that's why so many viewers dislike it. there's this idea out there that fanbois will hate on anything different. that's not true. different is good. but finn is terrible in this movie, and that's a wasted character, i guess because rian didn't find a meaningful role for him to fill. same thing happened with poe. neither of these characters seemed to change in any meaningful way, except, i guess poe is more likely to follow orders now? 

    in empire, all three main characters grow by bouncing off each other, sharing experiences, hardships, and failures with a few small successes. you got a real sense of them getting to be closer friends. that wasn't the case in this movie. and that's part of what makes it so unlikable. 

  5. i mean, we could argue the existence of deities all day long, but the question in the OP is "why are there fewer religious adherents?"

    i think the answer is simple: because the evangelicals are destroying the christian faith by acting unchristian and uncompromising. and their heavy involvement in politics, and in, say, the gay marriage argument has really affected how young people think about religion. whereas in the old days, people would still go to church, even if they did not believe, now people feel fine not involving themselves in the one-time necessary social sunday circle.

    i don't think it is a war of science against faith, which seems to be what most of you are arguing. it's a war of faith vs humanity. people now know gay people, and they are finding out that they are just like us, except they like to put their sexual body parts in different spots. more people know more things, now, about other human beings, and the hyper-conservative, political approach a lot of christianity espouses turns off the youth. 

    just my dumb take.

    • Like 6
  6. 11 hours ago, Napoleon said:

    Alcohol + No Upward Mobility = ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

    It's not just that. I mean, booze is definitely a factor, but I was in Greenwich one Sunday afternoon, and watched one normalish looking dude with his daughter on his shoulders try and start shit with another drunk guy. They just like to fight and break things, regardless of social station. 

    • Like 1
  7. 23 minutes ago, Goo Punch said:

    Right. Let's recap what happened today:

    1)Someone asked a question about the game

    2)I answered his question

    3)Like five of you started talking shit to me and insulting me out of nowhere, completely derka'ing the thread

    4)Y'all whined about the thread being Derka'd

     

    thats a factual recap of what happened. it's amazing how you all actively seek me out starting shit and then whine when you get what you went looking for. 

    oh and of course hen you all pos rep and circle jerk each other about it. edit: case in point, cheeseweasel, the guy who called me a douchebag out of nowhere starting the whole thing is pos repping your post. you all are delusional 

     

    @hayden_horn tell me that's not exactly what happened today 

    i dunno, i took off work to watch the game and i'm mostly drunk right now. i saw some shit in the thread, but couldn't be bothered to read it. 

  8. 16 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

    applause-gif.gif

    kind of funny, but kind of indicates that you haven't partied in london. those fuckers are crazy, and i cannot even imagine the more blue collar towns.

    here's a great article i found about the prep england put into the penalties. their manager, southgate, famously failed in a penalty shootout against germany in euro 96:

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/jun/29/gareth-southgate-lay-ghost-euro-96-penalty-shootout

    redemption stories are fucking great, man.

    • Like 1
  9. 3 hours ago, GhostOfTomJoad said:

     

     


    So be thankful that we're not involved in the war he was leading us towards?

     

    ok.

    ok.

    yall see what's happened in this tweet, right?

    it's more than simply touting some semblance of success (as much as it can be a success with the north koreans upgrading nuclear facilities this last weekend).

    he is actively throwing the democratic party in with the press as something to be castigated. not only that, but he has continued his campaign of dehumanization. the press is "fake news" not to be trusted, and now the democratic party is the "Opposition Party", with caps to make sure the message is driven home. that, my friends, is despotic, chavez-style rhetoric.

    this is exactly how chavez began his takeover of the venezuelan government. this is now officially kind of scary. combine that with the optics of our government celebrating OUR independence day in fucking russia, and it seem that they are actively trying to thumb their nose at american convention. 

    • Like 5
  10. i also think that he game has a momentum factor built in. if my opponent, superior or inferior, scores an early goal, then shit gets impossible. i think that's kind of a fun idea, honestly, as momentum is a real thing. 

    but late season games against shitty teams should look like early season games against shitty teams. i don't mind losing to better teams. that's going to happen more often than ont, and it is what makes building a better team fun. but i feel like there are false equivalencies built in at times. i was playing a rather poor leicester squad in the second to last game of the season, with the championship in the balance. spurs would simply not lose, which is another thing that happens in this game during the run in - the game identifies a team to compete with you for first, and makes them a cut above in every match including against equal competition. whatever. i get it. but leicester RMs were keeping pace with mine and shoving me off the ball with regularity. when i play a ball through, probably 8-10 yards ahead, on a break, somehow their super-middies would catch up and make my life miserable. i still won, but even my wife was again asking why i play this game if it is so unfair and she barely pays attention over the top of whatever book she's reading. 

    i must be doing something wrong, i reckon, that it makes it that difficult. i even do very regular training exercises with my team to make them individually better. doesn't seem to matter in certain matches. i don't want a 38-0 PL season. i just want to feel like the pitch isn't tilted in one direction without reason.

×
×
  • Create New...