hayden_horn

i agree with most everything except cronkite. this is my first year in section 31 but Holy fuck the sound was at 11 last night. I've been to two rock concerts this month that were quieter. they were also pumping band noise through the thing. also i appreciate the effort texas cheer but i can't see the play at midfield when yall hold up the signs on third down. please stop doing that.

if herschel wins...i dunno yall

well i for one appreciate the payout since i bought twitter at $15. but this is an incredible high speed train wreck. this dude is on drugs.

cool coolcoolcoolcoolcool

lol. i just watched this show. i loved it - it was pretty accurate on the whole, and there were some pretty cool subtleties that they weren't too obvious about. yakuza are indeed everywhere. i lived in nagoya, not tokyo, but right near the yakuza neighborhood. once had a yakuza threaten to fight me. saw a yakuza tattoo. was called a gaijin multiple times everyday, most of which were supposed to be stage whisper surreptitious.

this is not a serious person

could be the cause of the yips. happens to guys who hurt themselves following through sometimes. they get some timid happy feet. perfectly okay and natural and you still gotta pull him when it's obvious

that was some serious bullshit game fixing shit today yall

for fucking real. no measurement on an already bullshit spot. just move the sticks whatever lol

he's not wrong, but he's still pretty fucked. those white knuckles aren't lying.

nah. beto only gets the points if he grabs onto biden's talking points about jailing nonviolent drug possession. i happen to think he can drive legalization, especially given surrounding states' success with it, but he seems to want to follow the texas democrat "try to be republican lite" play policy defense strategy and hope for another clayton williams moment. seriously. that bit of republican self-sabotage ruined the texas democrats forever.

my sis managed. but she was sadly on all kinds of stuff. she was also poor, not a multi-billionaire. this makes sense. but i really think there's some drugs going on. he used to think less tactically and more strategically. he's lost all long term repercussions in his thinking. that's someone waiting for the next high.

might could be but i was fucking shocked and kind of a little mad and disappointed at how they capitulated there at the end. i would be on the "fire whoever" bandwagon for that level of quit in that big a rivalry. jesus, it was kind of sad if it wasn't so fucking glorious

kanye is sick but Elon is on meth. all the signs are there. he was sliding before he met grimes but I'm willing to bet she introduced him to the bad stuff. and no one can police him. it's amazing to watch a drug addled dude richer than god pontificate on Twitter. it's also sad. but I'm here for the show. the man lands rockets and launched his car into space for crissakes. imagine what he could accomplish without the drugs.

yeah, that and mizzou 2008 are it for me. i was also in the upper deck that day and had made the early morning drive in from Dallas from Thanksgiving. though i do remember it getting pretty loud when we kicked the field goal against ucla in 97. there were about 10 of us left so the jeer echoed around the stadium.

holy shit i would be under the jail for multiple murder if this goes down on any plane i'm on, i don't fucking care if it's swa to dal. the bald guy is all of us.

one precedes the other. they got fat somehow. it's the dismal tide.

they've all gone downhill. thanks a lot "man, i like em thick" dudes. now all the strippers are a bunch of fatasses.

of course it is. because i cannot reconcile your motivation. i guess i'll side with dumbass for now. can you really not see the disconnect in your world view and your posts? it's like the grand fucking canyon.

this reminds me of something that happened to me recently. i sat on a jury. not a good one. it was a bad one - super aggravated sexual assault of a minor under 6. victim remembered it at 10. i won't get into details, but we ended up finding the guy guilty. unsurprisingly, i was the last holdout on the uncertain part of the jury. i convinced myself with a couple of other reasons i'll not get into - but the point is this: there is a truth out there. there is what happened. that's the truth. then there are memories of what happened. those aren't always the truth even if they aren't always lies. i had to understand and accept one thing to vote guilty: i would never, ever, ever know the truth about what happened on those two days. now, that was easier for others to get to than it was for me. we didn't have video, we had faulty, broken human memory. prosecution told us that a not guilty verdict meant we didn't believe the victim's testimony. i resented that. i absolutely believed that everyone that testified was 100% convinced of the truth, even of there were differences in stories. however, we did our best. and i think we got it right in the end. but i'll never know. i think i'll always struggle with that. and i think i'll just always struggle with not knowing generally. i'd much prefer to be certain. it'd make life easier. i'm baptized catholic. i've raised my sons in the church as much as i promised. i believe everything in the bible is written as though it was truth. and i think they did their best, and got pretty close to right in the end. but we'll never know. to answer your question: yeah, i have. once. not sure i'm still there, but it doesn't mean i don't consider myself catholic or christian more than anything else. what's the purpose behind your question? because it seems like you've asked it more than once as a shield. jesus wouldn't do that. he's entertain challenges and questions and answer everything in good faith. why won't you? jesus didn't require prerequisites to talk god stuff. why do you?

i don't want to ban you. i want to understand if you are really this stupid or if you are elaborately trolling. because if it is the latter, as much as i'd rather not ban anyone, i'd be obligated. so which is it? abject dumbassery or troll? will you at least acknowledge that asking children to suspend reality in a thread about faith is...paradoxical at best? at second best, ignorantly bigoted, i guess. at worst, for me, really, is that you are trolling. are you?

ok, in the thread about belief... come on, dude. you're trolling. i'm very close to banning you. it's a decent act, i guess. but try and post in good faith. it's tiring discerning intentional troll from abject dumbass. can you help me identify which you are?

or we can talk about it because he's black and that baby was gonna be black, so we ain't gonna miss it anyways. besides, we expect that kind of behavior out of the blacks, even the house...erm, good....erm, republican ones. long as he set the table, erm....goes in the back door...erm...votes the way we tell him, he's a good guy in our book!

you aren't answering why, though. why is it a conversation you'd rather have at home? what other social conversations would you rather have at home? what is so bad about someone telling a 5 year old about pronouns? i dunno if you are paying attention, but it's a thing. it's a pretty fucking important thing that's going on right now. there are a lot of very important things going on right now. it's very important to quite a lot of people and it costs us...nothing, really. so why does it bother you? how is saying "this is Rainy. Rainy prefers to be referred to as they/them" much different from "this is mr. richardson. he prefers to be called major richardson, or the major?" believe it or not, 5 year olds are way more capable of not giving a shit about this stuff than you are. they'll only make a big deal out of mr sarah if you do.