i've given a bit of thought to this while cleaning up my NYE mess.
i don't think this is exactly right, but i think i see what you are trying to say.
i don't think espn, and by extension, the national sports media, has nationalized the sport. as a matter of fact, i think they have focused on one particular region: the south. granted, football in the south is life in autumn, and has been as long as i can remember. but my folks are from ohio, and high school football up there is as big as it is here, despite books like friday night lights.
i think the problem we've got is the hype machine. we have rankings. we have impressions. we have eyeball tests. what the fuck is all that? in what other sports are those criteria applied? i guess you could argue that with ncaa basketball or baseball seeding there is some of that, but those tournaments are mature and make a team become a champion. and both those sports play longer seasons so you have more data points.
what we need is some objective criteria. win your conference? you are in, and we don't care if you beat an undefeated alabama to do it, and we don't care if you beat a two loss stanford team to do it. you are in. we want to add some at large (in the nfl they call them wildcards), then fucking do that. but make sure that we don't put the nfc and the afc on the same side of the bracket. wins and losses. not margin of victory. not style points. not eyeball tests.
i think this will have the benefit of making conference rivalries pretty important. if you can't progress to the championship unless you beat your conference mates, it really highlights the rivalries. right now, with the championship we got, all we'll get is sec fellatio the whole fuckin game.
and i think it's bad for the sport. if it is all sec all the time, then audiences will wander away that aren't in the south. i say that fully well knowing that texas is joining the sec.
the hype machine hypes the south, and the hype machine is the gasoline for recruiting. the nfl has a draft, which introduces parity, along with the salary cap. cfb is the wild west.
my point is that the south might strangle the national aspect of the sport. maybe espn has run demographic data to understand that the south is the biggest audience for college football. if they aren't careful, the south might become the only audience for college football, because the championship is only running through there right now.