Nuance is a part of everything. So, it depends. 9/11 - terrorism, more than obviously. Most recent missile attack in Ukraine? It's too soon to know for sure, but it appears to me to be collateral damage. Was it really "indiscriminate bombings of civilians?" Was the hotel the intended target? From what I understand, Russia frequently targets that city because it's Zelensky's hometown. Can they aim the missile used with pinpoint accuracy? Did it hit its intended target?
The intel failure surrounding 9/11 isn't the same thing as what has happened here. It's not in the same ballpark; it's not even the same fucking sport.
The Newsweek article, which is the one I was talking about as being flawed information, did not use Tenet as a source.
People have got to be able to recognize bias, misinformation and propaganda. Especially now that so much of the "media" is solely focused on making money and journalistic integrity is a quaint concept from the past. Look at the headline: "Missile Strike on Americans." Really? Was the missile strike intentionally aimed at Americans, like the headline would lead you to believe? Or is it that there just happened to be Americans staying at the hotel that was hit? (No Americans were injured or killed, by the way.) Why would the Russians target Americans now? Right after our president just publicly sucked off Putin? Putin's going to do something to turn the American people against Trump at the moment he has us right where he wants us? That doesn't make any fucking sense.