Just reading this thread, there are some misconceptions about what Tech can afford.
Truth is, things have changed drastically in the last 2 decades in terms of money available for hiring coaching talent. I believe we have been tighter than most in this regard. Even if we could compete on that level with Texas or aggy (we cannot), we wouldn’t. Were not too far off the pace IMO.
We do dumb shit, but not with the money.
We’d open funding for Dana for sure, and Venables if he checks out. Dana would work. BV would not....just not a fit, imo.
Only knock on Venables is he has never had all of the responsibility before, and were not interested in going thru another trial period. Personally, i think there are better HC candidates on the Clemson staff than BV.
We would not consider The Major and he probably would not want to be in Lubbock.
The Troy HC Neal Brown is doing well and I like him as a darkhorse over Littrell. He was the only bright spot on Tubs staff at Tech and bounced back nicely. One thing he has over the others is that he has taken inferior talent into Norman and blown their doors off despite his HC cutting his nuts.
There is this notion that if we would just get a defense, all problems solved. Pfft. Bama has a goddamn D. Nobody else does.
Only freaks across the 2 deep is shutdown D possible. But we could be better.
Other than that, the Utah St HC has a record but i have no clue about him.
If this were 2 years ago Id want PJ Fleck...just to see the show.
Beat OU. Again. Please.