Jump to content

oSuJeff97

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3,318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by oSuJeff97

  1. Exactly my point. It makes way more sense that they brought him back because having the two of them together is one of the things that makes the show awesome.
  2. It 100% sounds like FanBoy message board garbage. Like how does Grogu not continuing on the show eliminate merchandising? They still sell stuff related to the original Star Wars movie that is damn near 50 years old now, but people aren’t going to buy Grogu stuff if he left the show in 2019? LOL ok nerds.
  3. That’s exactly what someone who only eats salad would say.
  4. What'd you come down here for then? To tell you about the Portuguese waitress... Welcome back...
  5. Would you say that I have a *plethora* of piΓ±atas?
  6. BTW, this movie is currently on HBO Max for those interested. One thing I realized watching last night that I don't think I ever noticed before... the writing credits are Steve Martin, Lorne Michaels and Randy Newman. I know he wrote the songs, but it's interesting he got a story credit too.
  7. I'd like to continue to work for free, Mr. Flugleman...
  8. I said shoot UP. We both shot UP. It's like living with a six year old....
  9. Well to be fair, (a) we barely even tried to be competitive at football for like 70 years and (b) our "big brother" is a top 3-5 all-time program in college football, while texas aggy's is... not.
  10. [Speaking in Korean....] "Which means, 'this guy...... this isn't my type of guy'...."
  11. Yeaaaaaaaahhhsssss. I've been waiting for this to air since they recorded it.
  12. Yeah I mean take another movie that Affleck directed - Argo. Did anyone not find that film less enjoyable because they knew that the Americans were going to get out?
  13. Yeah I think the trailer is just OK. But as you said here and I noted earlier, Affleck deserves the benefit of the doubt as a director. Gone Baby Gone, Argo and The Town were all fantastic.
  14. The "Broncos had no talent" argument is a bit disingenuous. Those 80s Broncos teams may have not been on par with the 80s 49ers or Giants, but they were very good; it's just that the NFC teams were generally better and there were a few all-time great teams that nobody was going to beat. And the 1987 Broncos were definitely considered one of the best team in the NFL that year and were a 3-point favorite in the Super Bowl over the Redskins. It's not like they were playing against some juggernaut or all-time great team like there were in their other two 80s Super Bowls ('89 49ers and '86 Giants). They were playing a good (but not great) Washington team with their backup QB starting. The Broncos (and Elway specifically with 3 INTs) just totally shit the bed in that game.
  15. Well they were huge in the running world; they just weren't known as making shoes for any other sport. It would be like today if all of a sudden New Balance signed the biggest basketball star coming out of college and made a shoe for him.
  16. I saw a thing on Twitter after the game that noted we are now 7-1 in Big 12 games in which Cisse plays. The only game we lost that he’s played in was the 2-point loss at KU.
  17. Guys I don't want to shock you but I just heard that ShaggyBevo shut down.
  18. Affleck more than won me over as a director with Gone Baby Gone, Argo and The Town. So IN for this.
  19. Well of course oil is always all over the place for all sorts of reasons. Gas fundamentals are shit right now. March storage gonna end the season WAY above 5-year average... October storage projections looking crazy high as well, even with Freeport coming back online and if we end up with another record power burn this summer. Will be interesting to see if/when production falls off... seems like Haynesville could flatten out, but Permian I imagine will keep blowing and going as long as crude stays roughly where it is. Could be rough until 2025 when more LNG capacity comes online.
  20. Yes but that's the thing... I don't think Chuck's motivation was pure insecurity. Granted it's been years since I watched those episodes, but wasn't a big part of it that Chuck didn't trust Jimmy to "wield" the law so to speak...? That he was worried it would become a dangerous tool in the hands of a con man/grifter like Jimmy?
  21. This may be semantics, but Chuck was an antagonist, not a villain. He may have been jealous of Jimmy's ability to connect with people on a personal level like he never could, but he also knew Jimmy for who he really was - a con artist/grifter who would happily take advantage of others for his own gain. And he correctly predicted that Jimmy would eventually leverage the law as part of his cons/grifts. Jimmy/Saul was the "villain," just like Walt was in BB.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...