Jump to content

Longhornfan1024

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    2084
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Longhornfan1024

  1. He's such a pussy ass bitch. He needs to get the fuck out of Texas and go back to Canada.
  2. After watching the game, I sat and tried to think of something he does really well. I couldn't think of anything. He's supposed to be great with the ball at his feet, but even that he managed to fuck up twice during the past two games.
  3. It's also cool how our entire midfield forgot how to be positionally sound on defense and were just running around like they didn't know what the fuck to do.
  4. Yup. I'm not sure there's a worse team in the league at taking or defending corners. I'm pretty sure there's a bigger threat that we give up a goal when we have a corner than the chance that we score a goal.
  5. Ref must not want to call another PK against Arsenal. That's two handballs and a foul in the box that have gone uncalled. The last handball was blatant.
  6. No, I'm pretty sure I'm right. Your statements in this thread provide that evidence. It's like when EMAW says circumstantial evidence isn't admissible. He may not know that he's completely wrong, but everyone else does.
  7. Well that was glorious.
  8. Based upon this statement, I'm going to go ahead and say that you don't even know what the proposed law does.
  9. It's because Morton denied it? Lol. It's because Morton is white. People of color are disproportionately more likely to get the death penalty than white people. Another reason why the death penalty should not be permitted. Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk
  10. I could not be more wrong . . . except for all the evidence you've provided in this thread that I'm correct. You can say that you value due process and proof beyond a reasonable doubt, but when it comes to discussing their implementation you make clear that you disagree with them and would prefer a system without them. You don't get to describe a system that lacks due process and other structures that are designed to protect life and liberty and then just tack on that "but they would be protected." In short, your claims that you value due process, the burden of proof, and other Constitutional structures that are designed to protect life and liberty are bullshit.
  11. Yep. This confirms my previous post. The issue here isn't whether logical arguments can be made in support of the death penalty. The issue is that Beeper thinks that persons accused of crimes should not be provided rights or due process. He just hates our Constitution.
  12. So you agree that your proposed solution doesn't exist in the real world. Then what is the purpose of your original post that history will look back on us as a nation of pansies? That heavily implies that you foresee a world existing wherein the structures we have in place to protect life and liberty don't exist and that you believe that future is favorable to our current situation. Do you not believe in using beyond a reasonable doubt as the burden of proof for criminal proceedings? Do you not believe in due process for persons who may be deprived of their life or liberty? Because it sounds like you view the Constitutional structures we have in place to protect life and liberty as burdens that need to be overcome. Perhaps 'king' is the most important word your post. You'd prefer the U.S. be an authoritarian system where a king can choose to execute citizens by executive fiat rather than a one that uses actual process to determine who should be held accountable and what form that accountability should take.
  13. I'm not sure I would label appeals and parole as abuses of the legal system. If we're going to take a person's liberty from them, we should want to get it right. And life without the possibility of parole seems like a good alternative to the death penalty that will address your concern.
  14. You'll have to fill me in. How? By being alive?
  15. Yup. He knew and is trying to cover his ass.
  16. You're saying that's what should happen in cases that don't exist. You're also failing to explain why that should happen. "It's common sense" is a bullshit, non-substantive, explanation. "It has a greater deterrent effect" is a bullshit, disproved explanation. "It's cheaper than life in prison" is a bullshit, disproved explanation if we're discussing real life and is a bullshit, unproven explanation if we're discussing your fantasy world where murder convictions are found within 45 days of the alleged murder and a defendant facing the death penalty chooses not to appeal.
  17. Any time the still frame at the beginning of the .gif is upside down, you know shit's about to happen.
  18. I gave you the benefit of the doubt and didn't think you'd actually be stupid enough to believe that we would ever be at a point where an execution takes place 45 days after an alleged murder.
  19. Fixed it for accuracy.
  20. This is wrong. There are no benefits that the death penalty provides that go beyond what life in prison provides. There are also extreme costs and risks. Vengeance is the only reason to use the death penalty. And I can tell from the rhetoric in your post that while you claim it's not about revenge killing, for you it's about revenge killing.
  21. Probably the Iranians.
  22. A huge chunk of those who want armed insurrection already need health care for all; they are just too stupid to know.
  23. Don't lie. You got a hard on when the image entered your head.
  24. Don't lie. You got a hard on when the image entered your head.
  25. They got knocked loose while he was sucking Trump's dick.
×
×
  • Create New...