-
Posts
313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Todd Gack
-
-
15 minutes ago, texifornia said:
-
1
-
5
-
-
11 minutes ago, mdmost said:
Rooting for thunderstorms
Even the weather control devices from this admin suck shit
-
2
-
4
-
3
-
-
8 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:
So you don't want to to win, i get it.
-
1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said:
Yeah run a woman again, that will definitely win and get hispanic male vote
hispanic males can go fuck themselves. and I say that as a member of the group. buncha ladder-puller machismo fuckheads...
A young, attractive, white female pediatrician who talks like a normal soccer mom and campaigns with Bernie on issues that matter can certainly beat dotard/dotard jr/little marco/etc
-
On 5/21/2025 at 11:54 AM, Chuckie Finster said:
The first 40-something straight, white male who can talk like AOC while also being able to shoot the shit with guy podcasters will be the next Democratic political star.
Kind of alarming that there isn’t one that comes to mind.Not male and not yet in office, but I see potential. Also would.
-
-
one can hope...
-
3
-
1
-
-
I don't necessarily agree that it's Trumps strategy because he's a moron without a plan, but Yanis is always good for an economics history lesson.
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:
I must have misunderstood then.
I agree that the traditional silent, somber “deep mourning” of a public figure won’t occur, but there will be a lot of people who will have big emotions about his death that will likely not respond favorably to those of us who will celebrate it.I'm actually curious about people's opinions on this. What percentage of the adult population will be legitimately sad about this scenario? I can't fathom it would be more than 20%. And I'd guess double that amount would be elated. The remaining 40% would be apathetic or, at most, nervous/uneasy about the implications of his death.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:
After reading the comments to the tweetthing (what do we call those?) I'm sure the journo felt he had more important and subtle points to make with Trump than that quite obvious piece of Trumpian bullshit. And he wound up letting him make a fool of himself anyway.
I get this point of view but I cannot disagree more that moving on to a different topic was the correct move. Whatever the next set of questions may be, trump is going to lie in his answer. He will lie, the interviewer will *politely* try to call him out, he'll say something like "this is why your industry is dying, because you're so dishonest and unfair", rinse and repeat. Nothing is gained by interviewing a habitual liar when you're not prepared to plant a flag on a specific issue and call him a fucking liar to his face.
This absurd ms13 question was a chance to catch him in a lie in real time, and actually have him react to being caught. Like, how simple would it have been to take a picture of your own fist and add the text on your iphone right in front of him? At worst, he would realize that the nazi cuntbag stephen miller lied to him about the actual tattoo. I dunno... seems like a huge missed opportunity to be a journalist with a fucking spine for once..
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, royiv said:
What have you seen that makes you think that this isn’t the plan?
Really just that they have not explicitly done that to date. Miller/Rubio/Bondi all go through the trouble of lying about the 9-0 court result, lying about the criminality of Abrego-Garcia, lying about the fact that our government is helpless in bringing him back. They have not said, in simple terms, that the executive is above the courts in all matters related to deportation. Just that the courts cannot direct the executive on how to conduct foreign policy. And now that I've typed this, it really seems like it's distinction without difference. So yeah... we are proper fucked.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:
That type of NDA would be likely unenforceable. “Sign this or we will leave you to rot in an El Salvadoran jail without access to the courts” would very much be under duress. There is also the fact that “embarrassment” isn’t a valid reason for the federal government to ask for an NDA.
6 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:Yes, and almost all NDA's yield, by their terms or by policy, to giving truthful testimony in court proceedings.
All of this makes perfect sense and I'd not entertain the idea in a sane world. But I don't put it past the administration to draft a brand new type of agreement that precludes the signee from disclosing anything to any judge/court "due to national security concerns" or some such bullshit. And even if it's not enforceable and is deemed legally void, the message sent is clear: shut the fuck up and go live your life in the shadows or we will dead you.
After today's unanimous ruling, it seems like trump really has no off ramp on this issue, aside from telling all the courts to go fuck themselves and throwing everything even further into chaos. I guess then we'll see how deep this black hole really goes.
-
Dumb question amnesty...
Would it be legal to bring this guy back on the condition that he signs an NDA? Blame the "activist judges" for forcing us to bring back a dangerous gang member criminal, put him in protective custody with his family and have some ICE goons threaten to disappear him again if he talks. It's a way for trump to take an L without losing his narrative and maybe he gets lucky and this guy's story never gets out.
-
16 hours ago, Huckleberry said:
My flood insurance went up 7x at one point even though I did everything "right." I intentionally made sure my purchase was in a 500 and not 100 year flood plain in the Houston area. Whichever engineer from the Army Corps most have been a graduate of the Fake Army Corps at A&M because when our neighborhood was resurveyed after the second flood (Harvey) we are the lowest point here.
So if I can get screwed when I didn't even ask for it then these assclowns can get fucked when they voted for it.
I think you can be at the lowest elevation in an isolated area adjacent to a floodplain and still be out of the floodplain. There would just need to be a breakline of sorts between the 100-yr floodplain and your area/subdivision.
The one thing that might've boned you is there may have been a LOMR (letter of map revision) in review at the time you checked the FEMA flood maps, and said LOMR might've shifted the floodplain due to surrounding developments. Hard to know for sure what happened without lots more details. But as a general rule, if you want to buy land anywhere close to a floodplain and you notice new developments being built in the area, it's very hard to trust the publicly available flood maps as being the most current.
-
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:
God. The billionaires just can't get enough of the orange cum-guzzling. I hate every fucking single one of them, and pray for a world full of Luigis.
-
5
-
1
-
-
I don't think it's nuance as much as people are trying to make sense of the potential logistics of it all. So you're stopped on the street, put in cuffs, and stuffed into a van. After that, I assume you're blindfolded and either taken to a random holding facility or straight to the airport. Is it there where someone tells you "I hope you told your family you loved them this morning because you'll never see them again. You're going to a South American torture prison where you will eventually die."
Or do they take a page from the family separators at the border and lie the way ICE told parents that their kids would be returned to them after a medical evaluation?
I'm not sure what exactly is gained from this clarification, but it's a mind-boggling series of events that we're witnessing and will likely need to explain to our kids someday.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:
My husband and I are looking to get a couple Glocks. We have a shotgun already. I’m not a gun guy, but through some research found that a Glock is a good beginner gun
yeah that's the Reddit consensus I saw for a low recoil starter handgun. Wife who has never even touched a gun will need something almost toy-like to learn.
And the shotgun is def on the list. Hunter buddies have been telling me that for years - pistol-grip shotgun with buckshot for general home defense.
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
Yep. Remember how all the Trumpers wouldn't shut up about how we all need to be armed, because "that's the last line of defense against an authoritarian state - disarming the public was how them Nazis were able to run roughshod and kill all those people!"??? Turns out, the fuckers were right about that. They just didn't tell us that they were the authoritarian state we'd have to worry about.
We're getting pretty goddamned close to "last line of defense" territory.
Prolly should be a separate thread, but what type of "arms" should a person who knows fuck-all about guns (me) look to invest in? Fired my first non-pellet gun at a range during my bachelor party about 8 years ago. Wife will be a hard sell to keep them in the house, but desperate times...
-
13 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:
"Nazi Barbie" in the comments pretty much sums it up
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, David Dennison said:
Trump's America:
-
1
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, Bullneck said:
In case you didn't know, this is the genius who replaced Liz Cheney.
-
1
-
4
-
-
9 hours ago, Biff Tannen said:
That’s a nice name. @Todd Gack. What is that, Dutch?
Indeed it is.
Another fun fact... did you know Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars?
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, tbone_ said:
Anyone know how this $250M contribution worked? Like did Trump just tell Elrod Zelle me 250 large and I’ll just give you the keys to the govt computers?
Super PAC is my understanding
http://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-america-pac-trump-d248547966bf9c6daf6f5d332bc4be66
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Israel vs everyone war thread
in Daily Texan
Posted