Jump to content

AnotherLawyer

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    357
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

600 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

1789 profile views
  1. Miltenberg is legit and this isn't his first rodeo. I don't know the guy but I attended a CLE several years back where he was one of the speakers and chatted with him for a while during the break between sessions. I got the sense that he doesn't represent persons who are guilty, but only he or his clients would know for sure.
  2. Why? Sounds like a perfectly lawful method of creating bias in the jury pool.
  3. Agree. $100k was a low-ball opener to provoke them into a counter. And all he was asking for was to allow him to invest in her business the way Tanya wanted, while they extort millions to not say anything about his whereabouts. His statements about just wanting to be left alone were pretty ambiguous.
  4. This is the most believable part, to me, having worked with people with unusual amounts of money. $5M doesn't make a shit of a difference to them if it's something they really want. And he was probably laughing inside at the "research" that led to the $500M calculation. What's in the public eye is the tip of the iceberg. His yacht was probably $20M give or take by itself, maybe more. What does he care about $5M? And he knew as soon as she accepted it that both her son and her were going to jail for extortion if they ever squeaked out a word...and all they had was his location anyway.
  5. Two weeks of silence and you couldn't let it die. I bet you walk around telling people they look like they have a "Case of the Mondays" as well, yeah?
  6. I just returned from a trip that started in Phila and ended in DC and I believe 1/100,000 of that would suffice.
  7. Didn't he have Willis as high as 2nd at some point?
  8. I still don't get it. Why SWAT? Isn't that like, I don't know, cosplaying as a chicken nugget at a masonry convention? What am I failing to understand?
  9. I don't understand. What does this mean?
  10. Yeah. Where he goes is probably what dictates which player you get--the arrogant asshole who throws his teammates under the bus? Or the talented-enough-but-not-elite pocket passer?
  11. Needs and a gap between Hunter and everyone else, for Barron. There are multiple teams in the top 10 that need help in the secondary but have more pressing needs. The Giants, for example, need help in the secondary but QB and OL are higher priority. Jacksonville also needs secondary help and my non-expert guess is they're hoping Hunter falls to them...but he's probably gone before 5. After that it's the 49ers, Steelers, Packers, Vikings, Lions...and all but the 49ers pick in the 20s. Most scouts grade Barron below Will Johnson. That logically puts him in the 20s. For Shedeur some of it has to be that he hasn't exactly shown himself to be a leader on the field, and has said some things that are puzzling for someone who has access to PR specialists and has some exposure to what bad PR can do to a player. A buddy of mine who played in the NFL said early in the season that he's a 3rd-round talent with a 1st-round mouth and name.
  12. It always amazes me that even lower-than-D-List celebrities can still pull amazing ass. How much money could Manziel have left? So it ain’t that. It’s got to be the lingering fame. Unless he spent his NFL signing bonus buying up the remnants of Pablo Escobar’s hidden stashes.
  13. It's "Westley" not "Wesley."
×
×
  • Create New...